“…For the compacted pack ice of uniform thickness, theoretical and laboratory studies show that P * c is basically controlled by the buckling strength [ Coon , 1974; Hopkins , 1994, 1998], while for those of various thicknesses, P * c is highly dependent on the available thin ice [e.g., Thorndike et al , 1975; Hibler , 1979, 1980; Flato and Hibler , 1995; Haapala et al , 2005]. Although there is no direct field measurement of P * c on the geophysical scale, numerically calibrated values from the dynamic simulations in the polar oceans and subpolar seas [e.g., Hibler and Walsh , 1982; Hibler and Ackley , 1983; Zhang and Leppäranta , 1995; Leppäranta et al , 1998; Zhang , 2000; Wang et al , 2003, 2006] are consistent with the in situ stress measurements [e.g., Coon et al , 1989; Tucker and Perovich , 1992; Richter‐Menge and Elder , 1998; Richter‐Menge et al , 2002], with a range of 10 to 100 kPa. The field measurement of P * t is usually more difficult, because tensile stress is often one or two orders of magnitude smaller than the thermal‐, motion‐ and tide‐induced stresses [ Tucker and Perovich , 1992; Richter‐Menge and Elder , 1998; Richter‐Menge et al , 2002].…”