2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-021-01552-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of Palnadu earthquake sequence in the Cuddapah basin and its tectonic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is inferred that this lower crustal intraplate earthquake with a large stress drop of 3.9 MPa might have been generated due to the sudden movement on an almost vertical fault due to high pore-fluid pressure caused by the presence of CO 2 -rich mantle fluids. Srinagesh et al (2021) analyzed a sequence of about 965 earthquakes in the magnitude range of 0.1-4.6. The main shock of moderate-sized earthquake (2020-01-26, M L ∼ 4.6) is located in the Palnadu sub-basin of the Cuddapah basin.…”
Section: Intraplate Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is inferred that this lower crustal intraplate earthquake with a large stress drop of 3.9 MPa might have been generated due to the sudden movement on an almost vertical fault due to high pore-fluid pressure caused by the presence of CO 2 -rich mantle fluids. Srinagesh et al (2021) analyzed a sequence of about 965 earthquakes in the magnitude range of 0.1-4.6. The main shock of moderate-sized earthquake (2020-01-26, M L ∼ 4.6) is located in the Palnadu sub-basin of the Cuddapah basin.…”
Section: Intraplate Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary locations of these earthquakes were obtained using the SEISAN software (Ottemöller et al, 2018). A velocity model (Srinagesh et al, 2021) based on the results of modeling the data from a nearby deep seismic profile (Reddy et al, 2004) is used for this purpose. We performed a velocity sensitivity analysis using the velocity models of Kaila and Tewari (1985), Reddy et al (2004), andSrinagesh et al (2021), which shows that the chosen model is slightly better than the other models (Figure S2 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Earthquake Monitoring and Analysis Of The Seismological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirm that the shallow focal depth of these earthquakes is not an artifact of the velocity model, because even for other considered velocity models and a model which does not have any shallow layer (Figure S5 in Supporting Information S1), the focal depth of these earthquakes did not change significantly. Srinagesh et al (2021) reported that the focal mechanism of the mainshock (Figure S6 in Supporting Information S1) is predominantly strike slip (NP1 strike, dip and rake as 270°, 65°, 180°, and NP2 strike dip and rake as 360°, 90°, 25°). Such a mechanism appears unusual and inconsistent with the regional stress arising from the Indian plate motion.…”
Section: Earthquake Monitoring and Analysis Of The Seismological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations