2022
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of interceptor performance for deep-v planing hull

Abstract: The acting on the planing hull is the most complex hydrodynamics simulation. Therefore, an analysis was done to evaluate drag, lift force, and seakeeping in two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) which is heave and trim. It was fundamental aspects of the overall high-speed vessel. This article focused on the hydrodynamic performance of a complete interceptor configuration that could control the motion behavior of deep-V planing hull in calm water conditions. The benchmark study was undertaken by comparing numerical re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study compares the results of the drag, sinkage, and trim analysis with 100% interceptor conditions in the close-to-keel position. Research verifi cation by comparing the results of the CFD simulation [3] with the experimental results which can be represented in Figure 10. The graph shows the same pattern between the two research methods.…”
Section: Ver Ifying Cfd and Experimental Results / Provjera Cfd-a I E...mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study compares the results of the drag, sinkage, and trim analysis with 100% interceptor conditions in the close-to-keel position. Research verifi cation by comparing the results of the CFD simulation [3] with the experimental results which can be represented in Figure 10. The graph shows the same pattern between the two research methods.…”
Section: Ver Ifying Cfd and Experimental Results / Provjera Cfd-a I E...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The eff ect of the layout and blade height of the interceptor was illustrated using numerical simulation [2]. The interceptor can reduce drag by as much as 57% at a Froude number of 0.87 near the chine position [3]. Mansoori and Fernandes proved that the interceptor was able to improve ship behavior by controlling the porpoising eff ect [4].…”
Section: Introduction / Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transition state demonstrated a significant improvement in trim and drag values; hence, the transition was the optimal condition for interceptor installation. Therefore, it was not advised to use the interceptor's maximum height under planing conditions since it could create excessive trim [18].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interceptor research using the Aragon 2 hull form has also been carried out by Samuel et al, with a 57% drag reduction in the close-to-chine position [14]. In other research with different interceptor forms, including the v-form interceptor, the result was a 21% drag reduced at a Froude number of 0.87 [15]. The choice of the optimal interceptor height greatly affected its efficiency [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%