2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of hybrid evolutionary algorithms for single machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 13} + swap and θ = 0.75. We compare the results found by ILS-RVND F ast not only with GVNS (Kirlik and Oguz, 2012), ILS-RVND SBP (Subramanian et al, 2014) and LOX⊕B (Xu et al, 2014), where in the latter the authors only reported the best of 100 executions, but also with the algorithms listed below along with the type of result presented.…”
Section: Graspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 13} + swap and θ = 0.75. We compare the results found by ILS-RVND F ast not only with GVNS (Kirlik and Oguz, 2012), ILS-RVND SBP (Subramanian et al, 2014) and LOX⊕B (Xu et al, 2014), where in the latter the authors only reported the best of 100 executions, but also with the algorithms listed below along with the type of result presented.…”
Section: Graspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some elimination rules were also suggested for the swap neighborhood. Xu et al (2014) proposed different versions of a Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm (HEA) by combining two population updating strategies with three crossover operators, including the linear order crossover operator (LOX). The initial population is generated at random and a local search is applied using the neighborhood l-block as in Xu et al (2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (5) ensures that each real job occupies only one position of the scheduling sequence. Constraint (6) ensures that each position can only be occupied by one job. Constraints 7and (8) guarantee the sequencing similarity of the jobs in setup decision variable ' ' and job scheduling decision variable ' '; i.e., if the job i processed in position k ( = 1) and the job i also processed immediately after job j ( = 1), Constraints (7) and (8) guarantee that job j occupies position k-( ( −1) = 1).…”
Section: Problem Description and Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors clarified the sequence-dependent setup time when the setup time for any job depends on the immediately preceding job; i.e., the setup time for the job i after job j should not equal the setup time for the same job i after any other job. Different algorithms were proposed in [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] to optimize the SMSP with considering of the sequencedependent setup times constraints. An ant colony optimization was presented in [16] to minimize job tardiness for an SMSP with sequence-dependent setups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pakzad-Moghaddam et al [22] presented a mixed-integer mathematical programming model for a single machine scheduling problem with deteriorating and learning effects. Xu et al [23] solved the single machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times and conducted a systematic comparison of hybrid evolutionary algorithms (HEAs), which independently used the six combinations of three crossover operators and two population updating strategies. More recent works that deal with advanced single machine scheduling problems can be found in [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%