2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8028759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modeling and Discrete Firefly Algorithm to Optimize Scheduling Problem with Release Date, Sequence-Dependent Setup Time, and Periodic Maintenance

Abstract: An evolutionary discrete firefly algorithm (EDFA) is presented herein to solve a real-world manufacturing system problem of scheduling a set of jobs on a single machine subject to nonzero release date, sequence-dependent setup time, and periodic maintenance with the objective of minimizing the maximum completion time “makespan.” To evaluate the performance of the proposed EDFA, a new mixed-integer linear programming model is also proposed for small-sized instances. Furthermore, the parameters of the EDFA are r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, this paper deals with larger and empirical sets of data that contain more constraints, which made it more realistic. In this research, the parameters covered a wider base than those in other studies, e.g., the setup time was 1-10 in the study such in Afzalirad and Rezaeian [36] and Qamhan et al [37], while in this study, the setup time is divided into four categories of 1-9, 1-49, 1-99, and 1-124. Furthermore, the processing time in this study was 1-99 but in other studies was 1-50.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In other words, this paper deals with larger and empirical sets of data that contain more constraints, which made it more realistic. In this research, the parameters covered a wider base than those in other studies, e.g., the setup time was 1-10 in the study such in Afzalirad and Rezaeian [36] and Qamhan et al [37], while in this study, the setup time is divided into four categories of 1-9, 1-49, 1-99, and 1-124. Furthermore, the processing time in this study was 1-99 but in other studies was 1-50.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Under the objective of minimizing a maximum lateness minimization [25] and minimizing the makespan [26], different algorithms were presented to solve the problem, the results showing their effectiveness. Likewise, Qamhan et al also presented an evolutionary discrete firefly algorithm (EDFA) to solve a real-world manufacturing system problem of job scheduling [27]. Touat et al focused on flexible maintenance under human resource constraints on single machine scheduling problems to minimize the sum of total weighted tardiness [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower bound is presented in the work of Qamhan et al [45]. The property depends on the latest release date and given as follows For any feasible schedule s, max i (r i + P i + S i ) ≤ C max Note: The lower bound of the problem is estimated by the maximum value between these three properties.…”
Section: ) Second Lower Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%