A Study of How Underperforming Firms Follow Industry Leaders When Adopting ERP Systems and the Economic Effects of Their Adoption Decisions

Abstract

Abstract:Researchers have proposed but not tested that early-stage adopters of ERP systems tend to be higher-performing firms that adopt as a means of gaining or maintaining a competitive advantage. In contrast, they have proposed that late-stage adopters are underperforming firms that experience institutional pressures and make adoption decisions partly in response to those pressures and to try to improve performance and catch-up to industry leaders. In this study, we examine the relationship between firm performance and ERP adoption. We found that late-stage adopters tend to have lower financial performance relative to the overall market in the years leading up to adoption decisions as compared to early-stage adopters that tended to outperform the market in years leading up to adoption decisions. This finding demonstrates the relationship between firm performance and ERP adoption. We also found that, postadoption, the relative performance of late-stage adopters tends to improve more than early-stage adopters. This finding suggests that following the actions of industry leaders and adopting ERP systems can have economic benefits for underperforming firms.

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Implementation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study

“…And although statistical tests were used to identify outliers the incomplete matches may affect the results, which is especially true for ROS and COGS. No distinction was made between early and late adopters, nor were the number of modules identified. As Ugrin, Morris, and Ott (2016) showed, late adopters have an advantage over early adopters.…”

IT Adoption and Sustainable Growth of Firms in Different Industries—Are the Benefits Still Expected?

“…Meanwhile, looking at Table 6, although there were differences between the industrial sectors, sales and the number of employees of IT-starting firms were larger than those of non-IT firms, and it can be seen that labor productivity was higher, profitability was higher, the debt ratio was lower, and the patent application rate was higher due to more R&D. Furthermore, in many cases, there was a sister or parent company, and the firms provided various incentives to employees. That is, firms that were competitive in size and other financial indices started using IT [24,44].…”

Assessing the ERP-SAP implementation strategy from cultural perspectives

“…Whenever the SAP systems do not fit, the adoption would ultimately deliver badly impact to the post-adoption performance, and their underperformance would act as snow ball effects to create major problems for the firm (14). Scholars addressed the organisations with good IT governance and organisation culture to have more effective ERP investments compared to those who do not have.…”