2020 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/dynamics50954.2020.9306169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Connectors and Feed Lines De-Embedding Techniques for PCB Microwave Components S-Parameters Measurements Up To 50 Ghz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…𝑅 + 𝑗𝜔𝐿 = 𝑅 0 (1 + 𝑗)√𝜔/𝜔 0 + 𝑗𝜔𝐿 ext (12) which is obtained from the common model [44] by neglecting the RDC term. This corresponds to the case with infinitely-thick conductor, and is reasonably accurate at high frequencies when skin depth is smaller than the cross-sectional dimension.…”
Section: A Theoretical Analysis Of Ztdr(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…𝑅 + 𝑗𝜔𝐿 = 𝑅 0 (1 + 𝑗)√𝜔/𝜔 0 + 𝑗𝜔𝐿 ext (12) which is obtained from the common model [44] by neglecting the RDC term. This corresponds to the case with infinitely-thick conductor, and is reasonably accurate at high frequencies when skin depth is smaller than the cross-sectional dimension.…”
Section: A Theoretical Analysis Of Ztdr(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the model (12) (25) where 𝑍 ∞ = √𝐿 ext /𝐶. Next, using binomial expansion for (25) and keeping only the first two terms (high frequency approximation), we get 𝑍 LINE (𝑠) ≈ 𝑍 ∞ (…”
Section: Derivation Of (13)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, some potential sources of error are hypothesized and overcome by proposing solutions based on a de-embedding plane that can ensure a TEM (or quasi-TEM) mode propagation. 6,7 In particular, in reference 8, the electrical performance of the test patterns used in the deembedding method for DUT characterization was studied thoroughly and for all test patterns, and full wave models were built and then analyzed based on simulated electrical performances. About analytical methods, Chen 9 has shown that the de-embedding procedures are sensitive to manufacturing variations in the test fixtures, as well as inaccuracies associated with the calibration and measurement process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the de-embedding of the test fixtures (usually named "left" and "right" fixtures) need to be applied in order to extract the impact of their presence from the overall measured S-parameter. This is done knowing the S-parameter data of the single fixtures that are applied before and after the DUT [5][6][7][8][9]. Usually the well-known de-embedding process in frequency domain is based at least on three main conceptual steps: first, the conversion of the S-parameters in the transfer scattering parameters (Tparameters) [10], second the algebraic manipulation and inversion of the T-parameter matrices, and third the final T-to-S parameter transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%