1973
DOI: 10.5006/0010-9312-29.10.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Cathodic Polarization and pH Changes in Metal Crevices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, most recent studies have utilized the thermodynamic, rather than kinetic, approach, with emphasis on factors such as resultant crevice solution chemistry, pH, and electrode potential (8)(9)(10)(11). Little recent work has been done on the polarization kinetics of metals under crevices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, most recent studies have utilized the thermodynamic, rather than kinetic, approach, with emphasis on factors such as resultant crevice solution chemistry, pH, and electrode potential (8)(9)(10)(11). Little recent work has been done on the polarization kinetics of metals under crevices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have shown that there is only a 30–40 mV difference between the holiday and the bottom of the crevice after about 3 mouths at an applied potential of −850 mV (SCE) . Peterson and Lennox have concluded that the cathodic protection can be achieved for the crevices with a distance to crevice opening ratio of 12000:1 . The studies by Gan et al have shown that the local potentials of the steel X65 in the crevice are more negative than the potential of −850 mV vsCSE .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Potentials inside a crevice were generally measured by placing microelectrodes with salt bridges at fixed distances along the crevice. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The pH and some aggressive ions (especially Cl 2 ) in a crevice are recognised as the most common physicochemical properties of a local electrolyte contributing to localised corrosion. As a challenging job for several decades, pH in a local environment, such as a crack and a pitting, has been detected through a freezing method, by inserting microelectrodes, 16 or by extraction of the localised environment solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a challenging job for several decades, pH in a local environment, such as a crack and a pitting, has been detected through a freezing method, by inserting microelectrodes, 16 or by extraction of the localised environment solution. 2,17 The pH in a crevice under the disbonded coating has been measured commonly by in situ measurement using a glass electrode 9 or ex situ measurement extracting small amounts of localised environment solution by a syringe for analysis using pH reagent paper or glass electrodes. 2,14,17 The weakness of the ex situ measurement technique is distinct: not only errors occurring because of mixing of the solution, but also disturbing the equilibration of the local environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%