“…In the included studies, the classification originally proposed by Venieratos (Venieratos and Anagnostopoulou, ) was most frequently used (Prasada Rao and Chaudhary, ; Chauhan and Roy, ; Beheiry, ; Arora and Dingra, ; Loukas and Aqueelah, ; Maheswari and Sadanandam, ; Oluyemi et al, ; Chitra, ; Krishnamurthy et al, ; Uysal et al, ; Guerri‐Guttenberg and Ingolotti, ; Budhiraja et al, ; Kervancioglu et al, ; Lokanadham and Subhadra Devi, ; Sawant et al, ; Balasubramanian and Rajanna, ; Chaudhary et al, ; Kaur and Singla, ; Kumar et al, ; Master and Gupta, ; Meenakshisundaram nad Govindarajan, ; Sonje et al, ), followed by the classification according to Le Minor (Le Minor, ; Chauhan and Roy, ; Beheiry, ; Arora and Dingra, 2005; Maheswari and Sadanandam, ; Oluyemi et al, ; Chitra, ; Krishnamurthy et al, ; Guerri‐Guttenberg and Ingolotti, ; Lokanadham and Subhadra Devi, ; Sawant et al, ; Balasubramanian and Rajanna, ; Chaudhary et al, ; Dhar et al, ; Kaur and Singla, ; Kumar et al, ; Cambon‐Binder and Leclercq, ; Sekhar and Sugavasi, ; Master and Gupta, ; Meenakshisundaram nad Govindarajan, ; Sonje et al, ). The authors of seven papers suggested their own methods of classification (Kosugi et al ; Choi et al ; Loukas and Aqueelah, ; Uysal et al, ; Maeda et al, ; Guerri‐Guttenberg and Ingolotti, ; Kaur and Singla, ) and some of these were successively applied in other studies, while some authors did not attempt to classify the encountered variations of MCN (Yang et al, ; Chiarapattanakom et al, ; Aktan et al, ; Pacha Vicente et al, ; Channabasanagouda et al, ; Bhattarai and Poudel,…”