2007
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.7416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stokes permeability solver for three-dimensional porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of validation studies have been performed for FDM Stokes solvers. Bentz and Martys (2007) and Manwart et al (2002) tested their FDM solvers against analytical solutions for circular and square pipes and found the error for hydraulic conductance to be within 0.01-2%. reported.…”
Section: Validation Against Analytical Solutions Comparison To Lbm Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of validation studies have been performed for FDM Stokes solvers. Bentz and Martys (2007) and Manwart et al (2002) tested their FDM solvers against analytical solutions for circular and square pipes and found the error for hydraulic conductance to be within 0.01-2%. reported.…”
Section: Validation Against Analytical Solutions Comparison To Lbm Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported. Whilst validations on FDM and other models can be made on simple single pore geometries (Bentz and Martys (2007); Manwart et al (2002); Mostaghimi et al (2013)), these lack the pore-structure complexity exhibited in real porous media. In this section, we rigorously test our solver against analytical solutions for sphere packs and also compare it to a two-relaxation-times LBM scheme with three different 'magic number' parameters controlling the location of zerovelocity between adjacent solid and fluid voxels (Khirevich et al, 2015).…”
Section: Validation Against Analytical Solutions Comparison To Lbm Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WITH EXPERIMENTAL VALUES A 3D Stokes permeability solver for porous media 13,16,[28][29][30] was used to predict the permeability of reconstructed 3D structures of pervious concretes. This solver has been recently used to predict the permeability of virtual pervious concretes.…”
Section: Permeability Prediction and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,9 Computational material science-based approaches have been successfully used to study cement hydration and microstructure and property development in conventional cement-based materials. [13][14][15][16] Recent studies 17 have successfully used a virtual pervious concrete pore structure for permeability estimation. This study deals with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of pervious concrete material structures from two-dimensional (2D) images of real pervious concrete specimens and the use of these reconstructed structures to predict the permeability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%