2005
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2005.846861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic model for studying the laminar structure of cortex from MRI

Abstract: The human cerebral cortex is a laminar structure about 3 mm thick, and is easily visualized with current magnetic resonance (MR) technology. The thickness of the cortex varies locally by region, and is likely to be influenced by such factors as development, disease and aging. Thus, accurate measurements of local cortical thickness are likely to be of interest to other researchers. We develop a parametric stochastic model relating the laminar structure of local regions of the cerebral cortex to MR image data. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enable the study of morphometric properties of the human cerebral cortex and their relationship to cognitive function, disease state, or other behavioral variables, automated methods have been developed for segmenting and measuring the cerebral cortex from MRI data (Dale et al, 1999;Joshi et al, 1999;MacDonald et al, 1999;Xu et al, 1999;Zeng et al, 1999;van Essen et al, 2001;Shattuck and Leahy, 2002;Sowell et al, 2003;Barta et al, 2005;Han et al, 2005). Using such tools, relationships have been identified between regional cortical thickness and intelligence quotient (Narr et al, 2006;Shaw et al, 2006), personality measures (Wright et al, 2006;Wright et al, 2007), and memory (Walhovd et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable the study of morphometric properties of the human cerebral cortex and their relationship to cognitive function, disease state, or other behavioral variables, automated methods have been developed for segmenting and measuring the cerebral cortex from MRI data (Dale et al, 1999;Joshi et al, 1999;MacDonald et al, 1999;Xu et al, 1999;Zeng et al, 1999;van Essen et al, 2001;Shattuck and Leahy, 2002;Sowell et al, 2003;Barta et al, 2005;Han et al, 2005). Using such tools, relationships have been identified between regional cortical thickness and intelligence quotient (Narr et al, 2006;Shaw et al, 2006), personality measures (Wright et al, 2006;Wright et al, 2007), and memory (Walhovd et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental work has been done in [306] on active contour models, and in [272] on active ribbon models. Alternatives and extensions to these techniques have been made in modeling the cortical sulci through statistical shape models and active shape models [307]- [314]. In other work, a method based on filling a cortical mesh with gyral labels has been developed [315], and a surface feature extraction algorithm based on Laplacian maps has been developed [285].…”
Section: Cortical Surface Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these issues for thickness measurements for the CC, we draw on methods that were developed for the related problem of cortical thickness measurement [Barta et al, 2005;Fischl and Dale, 2000;Hutton et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2002;MacDonald et al, 2000;Schmitt and Bö hme, 2002;Yezzi and Prince, 2003;Zeng et al, 1998]. The problem of cortical thickness measurement is more difficult at the segmentation stage due to segmentation uncertainties in the location of borders due to partial volume effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of the abovementioned methods modeled the cortical thickness using: signed distance functions [Zeng et al, 1998], minimal Euclidean distances between vertices located on mesh-based estimates of each cortical surface [Fischl and Dale, 2000;MacDonald et al, 2000] and orthogonal projection from the inner boundary to the outer boundary [Barta et al, 2005;MacDonald et al, 2000]. In the first and second cases, many-to-one mappings may be produced because a single node or voxel may be minimally distant to many nodes or voxels on the other surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%