2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic games framework for verification and control of discrete time stochastic hybrid systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following results adapts Theorem 1 of [18] to the case of temporal logic formula satisfaction over a finite time-horizon. Theorem 1.…”
Section: Dynamic Programming For Sa F E − Ltl F Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following results adapts Theorem 1 of [18] to the case of temporal logic formula satisfaction over a finite time-horizon. Theorem 1.…”
Section: Dynamic Programming For Sa F E − Ltl F Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this section, we present a dynamic programming approach to determine a solution to Problem 1. Our analysis is motivated by the treatment in [18] and [50]. We then introduce the notion of secure control barrier certificates (S-CBCs), and use these to provide a lower bound on the probability of satisfaction of the sa f e − LTL F formula φ for a defender policy under any adversary policy in terms of the accepting runs of length less than or equal to the length of the time-horizon of interest of a DFA associated with φ.…”
Section: Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latest results include the use of model checking techniques in control of deterministic systems [4], games for controlling non-deterministic systems [5], linear programming and value iteration for controlling Markov decision processes [1], [6]. Through the use of abstractions, such techniques have also been used for infinite systems [7]- [12]. Alternatively, one can construct a discrete model using, e.g., [13]- [16], to which the above synthesis methods can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing computational results for reachability analysis of fully observable SHS often rely on dynamic programming formulations that require a discretization of the continuous space [2], [19], [6], [1], [18], or an approximate abstraction of the original model to an equivalent system that has the same properties [7], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%