2015
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2014.2381451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Temporal Logic Control for Deterministic Transition Systems With Probabilistic Penalties

Abstract: We consider an optimal control problem for a weighted deterministic transition system required to satisfy a constraint expressed as a Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formula over its labels. By assuming that the executions of the system incur time-varying penalties modeled as Markov chains, our goal is to minimize the expected average cumulative penalty incurred between consecutive satisfactions of a desired property. Using concepts from theoretical computer science, we provide two solutions to this problem. First… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This however converts the problem into a graph search problem over the product automaton. In the work of Svorenova et al [11], the notion of probabilities is taken in addition, over which an exhaustive search finds the optimal solution while considering the probabilities. In another recent work, Ulusoy et al [12] used product automaton to plan for multiple robots optimally.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This however converts the problem into a graph search problem over the product automaton. In the work of Svorenova et al [11], the notion of probabilities is taken in addition, over which an exhaustive search finds the optimal solution while considering the probabilities. In another recent work, Ulusoy et al [12] used product automaton to plan for multiple robots optimally.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trajectory and constraints are put into Eqs. (10) and (11) to get the optimal path. In other words, instead of directly computing the robot sequences τ r , the optimizer calculates the task sequences τ task ψ at one place and simultaneously fuses task sequences τ task ψ to produce the robot sequences τ r , at the other place.…”
Section: Solving By Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jing et al (21) considered a related version of this problem, with particular application to robot motion planning in adversarial environments. Svorenova et al (22) showed that this problem can also be solved for the case in which the deterministic transition system incurs time-varying penalties modeled as Markov chains. The cost was the expected average cumulative penalty incurred between consecutive satisfactions of a desired property, and the specification was a general LTL formula.…”
Section: Finite Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%