2015
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2015.1117189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic frontier analysis of technical efficiency in smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: The post-fast-track land reform outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
49
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
22
49
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the expectation as well as the previous studies such as Mango et al (2015) and Latruffe et al (2004), which confirms the fact that extension service provides technical support, including practice on right input use, market information and training on improved farming techniques. The coefficient of the household size variable in efficiency model indicates that households with larger family size are more efficient in resource use.…”
Section: Determinants Of Profit Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the expectation as well as the previous studies such as Mango et al (2015) and Latruffe et al (2004), which confirms the fact that extension service provides technical support, including practice on right input use, market information and training on improved farming techniques. The coefficient of the household size variable in efficiency model indicates that households with larger family size are more efficient in resource use.…”
Section: Determinants Of Profit Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Distance to market place might have impact on the access to information and agricultural technology and thus influences the level of efficiency (Thuo et al, 2014), since access to market encourage surplus production for market and also enhance access to agricultural inputs, it is expected to have positive impact on efficiency by minimizing the transaction costs (Latruffe et al, 2004). Participation in an extension program dummy, which is equals 1 if the farmers received extension service and 0 otherwise, is included to test the hypothesis that access to extension service improves efficiency (Kilic et al, 2009;Mango et al, 2015). Soil quality was included to test how the soil quality influences efficiency.…”
Section: Definition Of Variables Used In Efficiency Analysis and The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female farmers also have relatively less access to productive resources like loan and land. The result is in agreement with the findings of [7] that gender was an important determinant of efficiency among smallholder maize farming communities in Zimbabwe.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The coefficients of frequency of extension contact and training were also found negative and significant at 1% level, indicating that having more frequent extension contact and participating in training activities could improve technical efficiency of farmers as extension agents provide information on technologies to farmers. Mango et al (2015) and Obare et al (2010) found similar results.…”
Section: Estimation Of Productivity Parameters and Determinant Factorssupporting
confidence: 77%