2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01670-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A steel surface defect inspection approach towards smart industrial monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the manufacturing industry, computer vision is widely used with applications in, magnetic tile surface defects (Huang et al 2018), additive manufacturing anomaly detection (Scime and Beuth 2018;Davtalab et al 2020), steel surface defect inspection (Hao et al 2020;Sun et al 2016), defect detection in lithium ion battery electrodes (Badmos et al 2020), roughness prediction (Grzenda and Bustillo 2019) etc. GANs models, especially after improvement of its training algorithm (Gulrajani et al 2017), have been proposed for anomaly detection in structured and arbitrary textured surfaces (Lai et al 2018) and unsupervised inspection of surfaces (Zhai et al 2018).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the manufacturing industry, computer vision is widely used with applications in, magnetic tile surface defects (Huang et al 2018), additive manufacturing anomaly detection (Scime and Beuth 2018;Davtalab et al 2020), steel surface defect inspection (Hao et al 2020;Sun et al 2016), defect detection in lithium ion battery electrodes (Badmos et al 2020), roughness prediction (Grzenda and Bustillo 2019) etc. GANs models, especially after improvement of its training algorithm (Gulrajani et al 2017), have been proposed for anomaly detection in structured and arbitrary textured surfaces (Lai et al 2018) and unsupervised inspection of surfaces (Zhai et al 2018).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the intra-class diversity and inter-class similarity might exacerbate the misleading of the training model. To illustrate the complex variance of defects, Hao et al [2] demonstrated the ratio distribution and size distribution of steel surface defects based on the NEU-DET dataset. Intuitively, up to about three-quarters of the surface defects were measured to have a ratio of the long side to the short side between one to three.…”
Section: Datasets Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, owing to external factors such as equipment fatigue, human negligence, and external force, the steel surface may contain various types of defects. Consequently, these surface defects potentially affect the capability of steel products such as wear resistance, fatigue strength, and residual life [1,2], leading to huge economic losses for manufacturers and posing a high risk to worker safety. As such, defect recognition is an essential task for assuring product quality in manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a study [6] performed defect detection using sliding window methods to distinguish poor surface conditions (such as scratches and poor junctions). Furthermore, in the case of finding the locations of the defects, there are studies [5,20,21] on the detection of defects on the surface of steel based on yolo series [22,23], variational auto-encoder (VAE) [24], or R-CNN series [25], such as Fast R-CNN [26] and Mask R-CNN [27]. Similarly, [28] applied 3DCNN to analyze three dimensional point cloud data.…”
Section: Product Inspection With Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are papers that help researchers apply deep learning by creating open datasets. Teh NEU surface defect database is a steel plate defect inspection dataset opened by [32] and the aforementioned papers [19,20] also used the dataset. Moreover, KolektorSDD(Kolektor Surface-Defect Dataset) was created by [33] and PCB scans dataset, which are laser scans of PCBs, were generated by [28].…”
Section: Product Inspection With Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%