2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical sub-sampling tool for extracting vegetation community and diversity information from pollen assemblage data

Abstract: Keen, H. F., Gosling, W. D., Hanke, F., Miller, C. S., Montoya, E., Valencia, B. G., Williams, J. J. (2014). A statistical sub-sampling tool for extracting vegetation community and diversity information from pollen assemblage data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 408, 48-59Pollen assemblages are used extensively across the globe, providing information on various characteristics of the vegetation communities that originally produced them, and how these vary temporally and spatially. However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pollen data are limited by the original pollen counts in the samples and any transformation can only work within the limits of the original counts. To overcome this problem, methods adjusting the maximum pollen count during the counting process have been proposed—allowing pollen counts to be developed relative to the evenness and richness of the specific sample rather than a fixed number (Keen et al, ). Our analyses together with earlier studies (Felde et al, ; Matthias et al, ) suggest that methods accommodating pollen‐representation bias in pollen richness studies warrant further attention and should become as widely used as pollen‐production transformations in land‐cover reconstruction studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pollen data are limited by the original pollen counts in the samples and any transformation can only work within the limits of the original counts. To overcome this problem, methods adjusting the maximum pollen count during the counting process have been proposed—allowing pollen counts to be developed relative to the evenness and richness of the specific sample rather than a fixed number (Keen et al, ). Our analyses together with earlier studies (Felde et al, ; Matthias et al, ) suggest that methods accommodating pollen‐representation bias in pollen richness studies warrant further attention and should become as widely used as pollen‐production transformations in land‐cover reconstruction studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a). Target pollen sums for the Ghanaian traps were estimated using model 1 of the sample specific count method developed by Keen et al (2014). Application of the Keen et al (2014) model 1 resulted in pollen sums of > 5,500 grains per vegetation study plot (Table 1; Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the changes in taxonomic diversity between single samples and different pollen zones (PZs) within seam 1, several calculations for species richness and evenness were applied, using tools for biodiversity analysis as provided by [56, 57]. Richness is simply the number of taxa within an ecosystem, which is here calculated as the total number of palynological taxa within a sample or a PZ [58]. It can be measured at different scales, for which mainly the three terms alpha, beta, and gamma diversity have been used [59].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%