1992
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1992.t01-1-00011.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical examination of the chemical differences between interstitial and scavenged aerosol

Abstract: The difference in chemistry between interstitial aerosol particles and particles that were scavenged into fog droplets is examined using multivariate statistical techniques. 15 trace elements (P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Br, Pb, EC) were used in the analysis. There was a significant difference in composition between the two types of particles. S, Fe, Mn, and Cu were among the elements best describing the scavenged aerosol, while the interstitial aerosol was best described by elemental carbon (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrophobic nature of EC may strongly suppress the activation of these particles and their incorporation into cloud/fog droplets, diminish precipitation scavenging, and increase its residence time during these events. The results here suggest that aerosol solubility is strongly linked to the aerosol atmospheric lifetime as has been suggested in previous studies showing EC enrichment of the interstitial aerosol found in fog events [ Noone et al , 1992].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The hydrophobic nature of EC may strongly suppress the activation of these particles and their incorporation into cloud/fog droplets, diminish precipitation scavenging, and increase its residence time during these events. The results here suggest that aerosol solubility is strongly linked to the aerosol atmospheric lifetime as has been suggested in previous studies showing EC enrichment of the interstitial aerosol found in fog events [ Noone et al , 1992].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Some water-soluble particulate organics such as oxalic acid have wet-scavenging efficiencies comparable to sulfate (). However, clouds and fogs ineffectively scavenge hydrophobic EC in the atmosphere ( ). A field study in the Po Valley of Italy showed that EC was preferentially enriched in interstitial particles relative to fog droplets and that the fraction of EC scavenged to fog droplets was 6%, considerably lower than 18% of sulfate ( , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clouds and fogs ineffectively scavenge hydrophobic EC in the atmosphere ( ). A field study in the Po Valley of Italy showed that EC was preferentially enriched in interstitial particles relative to fog droplets and that the fraction of EC scavenged to fog droplets was 6%, considerably lower than 18% of sulfate ( , ). Chýlek et al () found that over 90% of EC was in interstitial particles in clouds over southern Nova Scotia, Canada.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replication technique using collodion film was used to collect individual fog droplets and microparticle-induced X-ray emission were used to obtain their compositions . The counter-flow virtual impactor was used to collect individual cloud droplets on nuclepore filters or copper grids, and their residual particles were analyzed by TEM and SEM. ,, These studies investigated compositions of individual cloud droplets and interstitial aerosol particles in cloud/fog episodes over continental, coastal, and marine areas. The major chemical components of cloud/fog residues were sulfates, nitrates, organics, and element carbon and some metal particles in polluted areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%