2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when combining the two datasets together, the accuracies achieved using the Adaboosting of J48 DT, wrapper k-NN based on a random search and wrapper k-NN based on the best first search were 99.7%, 99.7%, and 100%. These accuracies were greater than 95.84% and 95.98% of the method proposed by El-Toukhy et al [47] using the wavelet and curvelet feature extraction methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, when combining the two datasets together, the accuracies achieved using the Adaboosting of J48 DT, wrapper k-NN based on a random search and wrapper k-NN based on the best first search were 99.7%, 99.7%, and 100%. These accuracies were greater than 95.84% and 95.98% of the method proposed by El-Toukhy et al [47] using the wavelet and curvelet feature extraction methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the feature extraction step, some statistical features were extracted and Finally, the proposed CAD system has been compared with other papers in the field that have the same conditions to prove the efficiency of the proposed method as shown in Table 11. Regarding the MIAS dataset, it was clear that the results have shown that the proposed CAD system recorded the highest accuracy and AUC compared to El-Toukhy et al [47], Beura et al [15], Pawar and Talbar [16], Phadke and Rege [48], and Mohanty et. al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The diagnosis of breast cancer using mammogram by radiologist varies from expert to expert as symptoms are misinterpreted or overlooked, due to the tedious task of screening mammograms. Study reveals that 10% to 30% of the visible cancers on mammograms are overlooked, and only 20% to 30% of biopsies are positive [ 6 8 ]. Biopsies are traumatic in nature and costly; therefore, computer aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems combined with expert radiologists' experience would provide more comprehensive diagnosis [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a wavelet-based space-scale method (Arneodo et al, 2003 ), we show that the long-range correlations and anti-correlations respectively observed in the roughness fluctuations of the mammograms of dense and fatty normal breasts, strikingly vanish in the malignant tumor region. Note that most existing computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) methods (Karahaliou et al, 2008 ; Ayer et al, 2010 ; Tsai et al, 2011 ; Häberle et al, 2012 ; Meselhy Eltoukhy et al, 2012 ) are designed for texture analysis or feature extraction with the prerequisite that the background roughness fluctuations of normal breast mammograms are homogeneous and uncorrelated. In contrast, we propose characterizing correlations in mammogram roughness fluctuations via the estimate of a density fluctuation index H as an innovative and effective discrimination method that will assist in early breast cancer detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%