2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ref.2022.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-of-the-art review on modern and future developments of AGC/LFC of conventional and renewable energy-based power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 420 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by the above challenges and opportunities, in this survey paper we present a review of the different feedback control techniques and algorithms commonly used in the context of VPPs. While existing survey papers have focused mostly on the hourly and daily time scales of VPPs (e.g., dispatch, pricing, etc) [49], [50], [51], frequency controllers for multi-area power systems [52] (e.g., automatic generation control, load frequency control, etc), and general control technologies of energy systems [53], we concentrate on the different control algorithms and dynamics used for regulation and reference tracking in the sub-hourly time-domain in VPPs, i.e., primary and secondary control for medium and fast time scales in energy systems comprised of multiple distributed energy resources, aggregated and controlled via software-based architectures. We review the different definitions and technical features that separate VPPs from traditional power grids, their main advantages and limitations in the context of feedback control, as well as the different opportunities for the implementation of novel algorithms that can overcome some of the existing challenges.…”
Section: Contributions and Paper Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivated by the above challenges and opportunities, in this survey paper we present a review of the different feedback control techniques and algorithms commonly used in the context of VPPs. While existing survey papers have focused mostly on the hourly and daily time scales of VPPs (e.g., dispatch, pricing, etc) [49], [50], [51], frequency controllers for multi-area power systems [52] (e.g., automatic generation control, load frequency control, etc), and general control technologies of energy systems [53], we concentrate on the different control algorithms and dynamics used for regulation and reference tracking in the sub-hourly time-domain in VPPs, i.e., primary and secondary control for medium and fast time scales in energy systems comprised of multiple distributed energy resources, aggregated and controlled via software-based architectures. We review the different definitions and technical features that separate VPPs from traditional power grids, their main advantages and limitations in the context of feedback control, as well as the different opportunities for the implementation of novel algorithms that can overcome some of the existing challenges.…”
Section: Contributions and Paper Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of SC is to remove frequency and voltage deviations from the reference values of the VPP, which may result from the implementation of PC techniques [154], [199], [200]. In practice, secondary frequency regulation is also known with the name of Automatic Generation Control (AGC), which is often market-based; for more on AGC in the context of general interconnected power systems see [52]. Other functionalities of SC include power quality assurance, loss reduction, and reactive power sharing [201].…”
Section: ) Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the main incentive for the authors to apply the manta ray foraging optimization (MRFO) algorithm for achieving the optimum design of the control scheme. It shall be mentioned that the optimal design of the controllers used to regulate the frequency in interconnected power systems plays a crucial role in enhancing the power system stability, improving the efficiency of the power system and ensuring power from reliability and dependability [1,2].…”
Section: Challenges and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the MRFO algorithm has been employed to optimize a variety of benchmark problems and numerous engineering applications such as tension spring design, speed reducer design, rolling element bearing design and pressure vessel design [38]. The MRFO has some distinct merits when dealing with complex optimization problems, where these specific merits can be outlined as follows: (1) the capability to resist local minima trapping; (2) rapid convergence towards the optimal solution; (3) high degree of precision; (4) reduced computational cost; (5) low number of adjustable control parameters [40,41]. These numerous advantages of the MRFO reflect an impulse for the authors to apply the MRFO for solving the LFC problem.…”
Section: Challenges and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation