2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A star-shaped sensitizer based on thienylenevinylene for dye-sensitized solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the YD -series dyes show emission ranging from 639 to 686 nm. The Stokes shifts (110–858 cm –1 for YD22 – YD25 ; 305–513 cm –1 for YD26 – YD28 ) of these dyes were found to be relatively small compared to those of some metal-free dipolar organic dyes, , indicating a smaller energy required for geometrical reorganization of push–pull porphyrin dyes at photoexcited state.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All the YD -series dyes show emission ranging from 639 to 686 nm. The Stokes shifts (110–858 cm –1 for YD22 – YD25 ; 305–513 cm –1 for YD26 – YD28 ) of these dyes were found to be relatively small compared to those of some metal-free dipolar organic dyes, , indicating a smaller energy required for geometrical reorganization of push–pull porphyrin dyes at photoexcited state.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Push-pull type sensitizers with electron-withdrawing bridge groups have been explored, and molecular photoswitches have been studied with the intent to control sensitizer function by external stimuli . Structural changes in the bridge have been used to tune IET and recombination by “conformational trapping.” Several studies involved chromophores that contained multiple anchor groups or star-shaped molecules. However, in these examples, all anchor groups served the same function. The concept of employing multiple linkers with different functions, for example, one linker for stable chemical attachment to the surface and another one for promoting interaction between the sensitizer and the interface, is an approach that gives more flexibility in the design of sensitizers and can add functionalities beyond IET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Whereas many push-pull sensitizers based on this model have been synthesized, examples of sensitizers with a simple p-A structure namely devoid of terminal donor group remain scarce. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Thiophene oligomers (nTs) have been frequently used p-conjugating spacers in D-p-A sensitizers, [7][8][9] but there are very few examples of sensitizers based on pure nTs. Thus, a PCE of 3.36% was obtained with a quinquethiophene derivative with two carboxylic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, a huge number of metal-free sensitizers have been synthesized and evaluated in DSSCs cells and PCE exceeding 10.0% have been reported. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Thiophene oligomers (nTs) have been frequently used a π-conjugating spacers in Dπ-A sensitizers, 7-9 but there are very few examples of sensitizers based on pure nTs. 11,12 Most of metal-free sensitizers possess a D-π-A structure where "D" represents an electron-donating moiety such as a diarylamine or carbazole, "π" a π-conjugating spacer and "A" an electron-accepting moiety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%