Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A standards‐based Grid resource brokering service supporting advance reservations, coallocation, and cross‐Grid interoperability

Abstract: SUMMARYThe problem of Grid-middleware interoperability is addressed by the design and analysis of a featurerich, standards-based framework for all-to-all cross-middleware job submission. The service implements a decentralized brokering policy, striving to optimize the performance for an individual user by minimizing the response time for each job submitted. The architecture is designed with focus on generality and flexibility and builds on extensive use, internally and externally, of (proposed) Web and Grid se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, self-tuning mechanisms [18] appear as a solution in order to avoid as much as possible those unexpected situations and improve the forecasting, but introducing a general overhead. An algorithm to perform resource selection based on performance predictions, as well as though co-allocation of multiple resources is presented in [56] where already made reservations are displaced based on making co-allocation of jobs. But, unlike our work, those reschedulings are not carried out among jobs belonging to different users.…”
Section: Qos Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, self-tuning mechanisms [18] appear as a solution in order to avoid as much as possible those unexpected situations and improve the forecasting, but introducing a general overhead. An algorithm to perform resource selection based on performance predictions, as well as though co-allocation of multiple resources is presented in [56] where already made reservations are displaced based on making co-allocation of jobs. But, unlike our work, those reschedulings are not carried out among jobs belonging to different users.…”
Section: Qos Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the grid federation efforts we can find InterGrid [9] along with the work by Assuncao et al [3] that promotes interlinking different grid systems through economic-based peering agreements to enable inter-grid resource sharing, Gridway [67] through its grid gateways [22] along the work by Leal et al [35] that proposed a decentralized model for scheduling on federated grids to improve makespan and resource performance, LAGrid meta-scheduling [5,55,59] that promotes interlinking different grid systems through peering agreements to enable inter-Grid resource sharing, Koala [39] with the use of delegated matchmaking [24] to obtain the matched resources from one of the peer Koala instances, VIOLA [61] that implements grid interoperability via WS-Agreement [2] and provides coallocation of multiple resources based on reservations, Grid Meta-Brokering Service (GMBS) [28,29] proposes an architecture for grid interoperability based on high level abstractions to describe the broker's capabilities and properties using a specific language [30][31][32]57], the work by Elmroth et al [13] that presents a grid resource brokering service based on grid standards, Guim et al [56] studied scheduling techniques for multi-site grid environments, and within EGEE, efforts to enable interoperability between gLite and UNICORE [14] systems [38,51].…”
Section: Federating Computational Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elmroth and Tordsson also propose a co-allocation algorithm [17] for NorduGrid [26]. Their algorithm fixes a reservation time and searches a combination of required computers first, and the related network paths next.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%