The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2013.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From volunteer to trustable computing: Providing QoS-aware scheduling mechanisms for multi-grid computing environments

Abstract: From volunteer to trustable computing: Providing QoS-aware scheduling mechanisms for multigrid computing environments. Future generations computer systems, AbstractThe exploitation of service oriented technologies, such as Grid computing, is being boosted by the current service oriented economy trend, leading to a growing need of Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms. However, Grid computing was created to provide vast amounts of computational power but in a best effort way. Providing QoS guarantees is therefor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SLA trust negotiation, the CSC puts more important service properties in front consultation according to their own preferences [13,14], and the price is get in the final negotiations after the service level is determined, so the priority sequence of negotiation in this paper is , , , , , the CSC releases the request of the service level of the same properties to different cloud service providers at the same time. After the CSP side receives the request, it discloses to CSC the corresponding negotiation strategies of service properties.…”
Section: Figure 7 the Sub-diagram Of The Hcpn Model On Qos Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SLA trust negotiation, the CSC puts more important service properties in front consultation according to their own preferences [13,14], and the price is get in the final negotiations after the service level is determined, so the priority sequence of negotiation in this paper is , , , , , the CSC releases the request of the service level of the same properties to different cloud service providers at the same time. After the CSP side receives the request, it discloses to CSC the corresponding negotiation strategies of service properties.…”
Section: Figure 7 the Sub-diagram Of The Hcpn Model On Qos Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables a better network usage and in turns low-latency applications present a better performance. A similar approach in the Grid Computing field was presented by Conejero et al [14], where three QoS levels are provided by choosing more trustable resources (those which allow advance reservations) for applications that require higher QoS levels, always fulfilling the service level agreements (SLAs) for the high level QoS applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting proposal is the SA-Layer [55] which proposes a set of components for introducing scheduling in advance capabilities to Grids. With these capabilities, users can know how an application will be scheduled on the Grid which is fundamental to know if the application execution will fulfill the quality required by the user as proposed in [56].…”
Section: Resource Allocation In Distributed Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%