2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A standardized rat burr hole defect model to study maxillofacial bone regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 37 ) or especially by Liu et al . ( 38 ) because of its dimension, will help to confirm the null hypothesis of the present work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…( 37 ) or especially by Liu et al . ( 38 ) because of its dimension, will help to confirm the null hypothesis of the present work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In conventional methods, a large hole must be created to completely remove the cystic wall. Guanqi et al have reported that large burr hole defects have a higher tendency to be incompletely healed and prevent bone healing [ 19 ]. The number of walls surrounding the bone has a significant impact on bone healing, as adjacent bone walls contain both osteogenic and angiogenic cells [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heatmap representing the proportion of publications by year that utilized specific translational research methodologies from construct characterization to human trial to investigate craniofacial tissue engineering 49‐72,74‐77,79,81‐84,145‐197 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%