A stakeholder-based assessment framework applied to evaluate development scenarios for the spatial data infrastructure for Flanders

Macharis, Cathy; Crompvoets, Joep

doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.04.001

Cited by 21 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Geospatial data are no longer the sole territory of specialised mapping agencies and experts, but a tool that is becoming indispensable for modern governance. To ensure that various stakeholders have access to the data and see the added value of geospatial data, there has to be a creation of geospatial e-services and accompanying structures and processe, to govern the sharing of this geospatial data [20,21]. Furthermore, the data can be used to improve existing e-services with a geospatial component.…”

Section: Geospatial Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

Chantillon

Crompvoets

Peristeras

2017

IJGI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geospatial data and geospatial e-services require governance and coordination between different governmental organisations.This article aims to understand what governance, and specifically what coordination, is used in Belgium for geospatial e-services and data. The Belgian case, with a focus on the regions and federal administration, is researched by making use of a document analysis, interviews with key stakeholders and an online survey. In contrast to the federal and Walloon administration, the Flemish administration and the Brussels Capital Region administration have a clearly developed governance model. Flanders combines hierarchy with network governance, whereas the Brussels administration is known for its hierarchical way of working. The transposition of the INSPIRE Directive had a strong influence: The Brussels Capital Region became more network-oriented, and the Walloon Region developed a form of network governance. The federal level, however, struggles to make the connection between geospatial data and e-services. From an inter-organisational perspective, the coordination can be labelled as a weak form of network governance: Cooperation exists, but only in a few areas. Nevertheless, geospatial data are exchanged within and between regions and the federal level. Geospatial e-services are also developed but there is a clear influence of the degree of organisational coordination on the development of geospatial e-services.

show abstract

Section: Geospatial Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

Chantillon

Crompvoets

Peristeras

2017

IJGI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But in the present research, similarly with the approach followed by Macharis and Crompvoets [33] and Dooms and Macharis [44], the measurement methods related to the selected indicators are all qualitative in nature as the considered alternatives are future situations that have not been implemented yet.…”

Section: Mamca Step 4: Indicators and Measurement Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methodology is unique in its field, as it includes indepth involvement of all relevant stakeholders and reveals their way of thinking [33]. Some of the classic MCDA methods were extended to support group decision -making, creating hence the so-called Bsecond-generation^MCDA methods or Multicriteria Group Decision Making (MGDM)/ Group Decision Support Methods (Systems) (GDSM(S)).…”

Section: Methodological Framework: the Multiactor Multi -Criteria Anamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Initially it was used for intermodal terminals' allocation [1]. Geudens et al [32] and Macharis and Crompvoets [33] used MAMCA to assess and compare different Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) policy strategies in Flanders area, Belgium. Focusing on Flanders again, Vermote et al [34], applied MAMCA under the objective of evaluating alternative freight road network scenarios.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Financing urban transportation infrastructure in a multi-actors environment: the role of value capture

Roukouni

Macharis

Basbas

et al. 2018

Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose A family of innovative financial mechanisms and tools for urban public transport, based on the value increment caused by enhanced accessibility, are lately gaining much popularity as a solution to the challenges posed by public financial resources' shrinkage: Value Capture Finance (VCF). The effectiveness of applied transport financing policies depends significantly on the level of agreement among stakeholders, making collaboration a prerequisite for success. The research presented herein assesses alternative financing options for urban public transportation which are based on the VCF concept. Method The Multi -Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) developed by Macharis [1] is used. The methodology is unique in its field, as it includes in-depth involvement of all relevant stakeholders and reveals their way of thinking.

show abstract

“…In [15,16], SDI is exposed as an integration of a number of components to create a platform that enables all stakeholders to access, share, and use spatial data efficiently. They propose multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA), a methodological framework of SDI development which has been applied to the SDI in Flanders (Belgium).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure Development Framework: Croatia Case Study

Tavra

Jajac

Cetl

2017

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial data infrastructure (SDI) related to marine spatial data is known as marine SDI (MSDI). In this paper, we determine data themes under the MSDI in the order of usefulness and efficiency. The purpose is to streamline and support the prioritisation of data to be further implemented in the MSDI. This is conceptualised using the logic of decision support systems and a multi-criteria analysis approach that integrates components such as data, stakeholders, and users through multi-criteria methods for priority ranking. This research proposes an MSDI development concept and is validated using the Croatian MSDI case.

show abstract

A stakeholder-based assessment framework applied to evaluate development scenarios for the spatial data infrastructure for Flanders

Cited by 21 publications

References 10 publications

The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

Financing urban transportation infrastructure in a multi-actors environment: the role of value capture

Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure Development Framework: Croatia Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About