2021
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stable metal–organic framework with well‐matched pore cavity for efficient acetylene separation

Abstract: Acetylene, an important petrochemical feedstock, is the starting chemical to produce many polymer products. Separating C2H2 from its by‐product mixtures is still an energy‐consuming process and remains challenging. Here, we present a metal–organic framework[Zn2(bpy)(btec)], with a desirable pore geometry and stable framework, which demonstrated a high separation performance of C2H2 from simulated mixtures. With the desirable pore dimension and hydrogen bonding sites, Zn2(bpy)(btec) shows by far the both highes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major driving force behind the recent explosion of interest in MOFs lies with their amenability to design using the reticular principle, which is unattainable for traditional porous materials. In particular, with respect to gas separation, crystal engineering of MOFs enables ultrafine control over pore size/shape and surface environment to realize enhanced or even sieving separation . Specifically, for C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation, since Kitagawa and co-workers for the first time introduced the prototypal C 2 H 2 selective sorbent in 2005, there has been little progress in this domain, and only a handful of MOFs out of 70,000+ total have been reported to be effective. Until very recently, there is a striking upsurge in developing highly efficient C 2 H 2 selective MOF sorbents, ,,− ,,− achieving the highest known C 2 H 2 /CO 2 (50:50) separation selectivity of 185 . However, dominating these C 2 H 2 sorbents of MOFs are those designed with multiple open metal sites (OMSs) that can significantly enhance the binding affinity with C 2 H 2 and thus boost selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major driving force behind the recent explosion of interest in MOFs lies with their amenability to design using the reticular principle, which is unattainable for traditional porous materials. In particular, with respect to gas separation, crystal engineering of MOFs enables ultrafine control over pore size/shape and surface environment to realize enhanced or even sieving separation . Specifically, for C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation, since Kitagawa and co-workers for the first time introduced the prototypal C 2 H 2 selective sorbent in 2005, there has been little progress in this domain, and only a handful of MOFs out of 70,000+ total have been reported to be effective. Until very recently, there is a striking upsurge in developing highly efficient C 2 H 2 selective MOF sorbents, ,,− ,,− achieving the highest known C 2 H 2 /CO 2 (50:50) separation selectivity of 185 . However, dominating these C 2 H 2 sorbents of MOFs are those designed with multiple open metal sites (OMSs) that can significantly enhance the binding affinity with C 2 H 2 and thus boost selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the two gas molecules have the same molecular size/shape (3.3 Å for both C 2 H 2 and CO 2 ), fine tuning of pore size or flexibility on MOFs is quite limited to achieve high separation performance. In this context, the most popular strategy is to introduce strong binding sites, such as open metal sites [25][26][27][28][29] or functional groups (e. g., NH 2 , SiF 6 2À , CN) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] onto the pores to enforce the binding affinity for C 2 H 2 . However, there commonly exists a trade-off between selectivity and gas uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breakthrough curves for binary CH 4 /N 2 (50/50, v/v) mixtures were collected at a flow rate of 5 ml/min (298 K, 1 bar) using a self‐made separation device 40 . In the separation experiments, Ni(BTC)(BPY) (1.14 g), Ni(BTC)(TED) (1.15 g), and Ni(BTC)(PIZ) (1.17 g) samples were packed into a Φ 4 mm × 100 mm stainless steel columns, and the columns were activated under vacuum at 150°C overnight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%