2019
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201800782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spin–Orbit‐Torque Memristive Device

Abstract: Memristors, demonstrated by solid-state devices with continuously tunable resistance, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] have emerged as a new paradigm for self-adaptive networks that require synapse-like functions (artificial synapse, for example). Spin-based memristors offer advantages over other types of memristors because of their significant endurance and high energy efficiency. [8,9] Yet, it remains a challenge to build dense and functional spintronic memristors with structures and materials that are compatible with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the SOT induced magnetization switching in the HM/FM systems, domain nucleation and domain wall motion are the dominant process. [ 12–14 ] If the amplitude of current density J is less than J C (defined as the smallest current density required to completely switch the FM magnetization), there will be an incomplete switching of FM magnetization. [ 13,14 ] In HM/FM/AFM trilayers, if the partial FM magnetization is switched, the height of the positive (negative) biased loop will be changed since the AFM interfacial spins will also be switched to align with the FM magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the SOT induced magnetization switching in the HM/FM systems, domain nucleation and domain wall motion are the dominant process. [ 12–14 ] If the amplitude of current density J is less than J C (defined as the smallest current density required to completely switch the FM magnetization), there will be an incomplete switching of FM magnetization. [ 13,14 ] In HM/FM/AFM trilayers, if the partial FM magnetization is switched, the height of the positive (negative) biased loop will be changed since the AFM interfacial spins will also be switched to align with the FM magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12–14 ] If the amplitude of current density J is less than J C (defined as the smallest current density required to completely switch the FM magnetization), there will be an incomplete switching of FM magnetization. [ 13,14 ] In HM/FM/AFM trilayers, if the partial FM magnetization is switched, the height of the positive (negative) biased loop will be changed since the AFM interfacial spins will also be switched to align with the FM magnetization. Thus, the change of the remanence and the heights of the sub‐loops in HM/FM/AFM trilayers could be delicately designed and realized by controlling the strength of SOT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next we compare the energy and speed performance of on-chip learning on our proposed MOSFET synapse based FCNNN with that on FCNN designed using some other kinds of synaptic devices that have been proposed and implemented elsewhere -spin orbit torque driven domain wall based synapses (spintronic synapses) [7,49,50] and memristive oxide based RRAM synapses [51,52]. For fair comparison between the different synaptic devices, neural networks with the same architecture and number of nodes needs to be designed with different types of devices as synapses and they have to be trained on the same dataset using the same algorithm.…”
Section: Comparision Of Performance Of Proposed Mos-fet Synapse With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which provide an efficient way to switch the magnetisation in systems containing heavy metals 6,7 or topological insulators [8][9][10] at room temperature. The manipulation of magnetic states by the current-induced torques provides novel capabilities for future technology -including memristors, building blocks for neuromorphic computing 11,12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%