A Spectrum of Interoperability

Arms, William Y.; Hillmann, Diane I.; Lagoze, Carl; Krafft, Dean B.; Marisa, Richard J.; Saylor, John; Terrizzi, Carol; Sompel, Herbert Van de

doi:10.1045/january2002-arms

Cited by 56 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…are covered by technical agreements; data and metadata and semantic agreements on the interpretation of the information are covered by content agreements; and the ground rules for access, preservation of collections and services, payment, authentication, etc. are covered by organizational agreements (Arms et al , 2002; Shen, 2006). Whereas the main object of this research is the survey of technical aspects of interoperability, the retrieved documents are studied and surveyed by this point‐of‐view.…”

Section: 3 Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interoperability models in digital libraries: an overview

Alipour-Hafezi

Horri²,

Shiri³

et al. 2010

The Electronic Library

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the existing interoperability models in digital libraries and to introduce related projects in each model.Design/methodology/approachThe study starts from searching various databases with a combination of important keywords in the field, such as interoperability, digital library, meta‐searching and cross‐searching. The study follows up with describing related digital library projects in the field of technical interoperability. The projects are described under three main categories, Federated, Harvesting and Gathering.FindingsThe study shows that most of the studied projects are located in the USA and also most of the digital library projects use OAI protocol and the harvesting model in order to be technically interoperable. Also, the results of the study showed that the projects mostly paid attention to metadata interoperability and only a few mentioned full‐text interoperability issues.Originality/valueThe paper makes an original contribution of exploring an area (interoperability models in digital libraries), that is at the forefront of discussion in libraries worldwide.

show abstract

Section: 3 Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three levels of interoperability were identified by Arms et al (2002) for Site for Science, federated, harvested, and gathering. In fact, each level has different operating procedures, standards and protocols.…”

Section: 1 Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interoperability models in digital libraries: an overview

Alipour-Hafezi

Horri²,

Shiri³

et al. 2010

The Electronic Library

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specifically, users anticipate better search capabilities across these networked information resources and the metadata records associated with the resources. The opportunities also exist for improved information exchange or integration in and between communities and applications (Arms et al, 2002; Chen, 1999; Moen, 2001; Tennant, 2001; Zeng & Chan, 2004). To improve capability for information exchange or integration, and to improve search across these resources, it is essential to enhance interoperability of systems and data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The opportunities also exist for improved information exchange or integration in and between communities and applications (Arms et aladdressing not only interoperability at the syntactic and functional levels but at the semantic level (Moen, 2001). Various information services such as federated searching, harvesting metadata, and gathering are often dependent on the capability and quality of semantic interoperability across different collections, systems, domains, and communities (Arms et al, 2002). Improved semantic interoperability provides a basis for more effective information services for users.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The semantics of semantic interoperability: A two‐dimensional approach for investigating issues of semantic interoperability in digital libraries

Chung

Moen

2007

Proc of Assoc for Info

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Fundamental to the interchange and reuse of data is the use of standards for data description [6]. In this regard, it is required to collaborate and adapt standards used in the region, such as the schemes developed in the LATTES platform http://lattes.cnpq.br.…”

Section: Information and Communication Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendations for an Integrated Information System at the Chilean National Council for Drug Prevention

Quiroga

Villatoro

Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study aimed at strengthening the information and communication systems for drug prevention, control, and treatment for the Chilean National Council for Drug Prevention (CONACE) is described. Diagnosis and recommendations are based on: analysis of the demand and availability of information and systems; evaluation of the CONACE Center of Documentation and Information (CDI ) collection, users, databases, and services; and, evaluation of the indexing language and the vocabulary for information retrieval used in the CDI databases. Guidelines for incorporating user requirements in the information and communication technologies used by the CDI are provided.The impact of the use of these information systems and technologies for collaboration at the national and international level are discussed.

show abstract

A Spectrum of Interoperability

Cited by 56 publications

References 0 publications

Interoperability models in digital libraries: an overview

Interoperability models in digital libraries: an overview

The semantics of semantic interoperability: A two‐dimensional approach for investigating issues of semantic interoperability in digital libraries

Recommendations for an Integrated Information System at the Chilean National Council for Drug Prevention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About