Interoperability models in digital libraries: an overview

Alipour-Hafezi, Mehdi; Horri, Abbas; Shiri, Ali; Ghaebi, Amir

doi:10.1108/02640471011052016

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This results in the cross-communication process in a closed environment. The inner communication is facilitated through some trusted/ credible nodes acting as notaries to verify whether a specific event has happened on one chain and taken agreed action on another chain [4,[19][20][21].  A decentralized approach assumes that the cross-communication occurs automatically at a protocol level through smart contracts in a distributed environment.…”

Section: Approaches For Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain Interoperable Digital Objects

Pillai

Biswas

Muthukkumarasamy

2019

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The future of distributed ledger technology such as blockchain is dependent on its ability to interact and integrate with other systems. Therefore, interoperability has become a fundamental issue that needs to be addressed. The emerging category of crypto-assets are managed and understood using different frameworks. There is, therefore, a need for a unified classification of crypto-assets. This work aims to bring some clarity to and understanding on interoperable crypto-assets and their characteristics. This paper categorizes digital crypto-assets for the purpose of implementing interoperability. The categorization of crypto-assets is based on their functionalities and their purpose. An interoperability scenario has been given for the defined crypto-asset classes.

show abstract

Section: Approaches For Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain Interoperable Digital Objects

Pillai

Biswas

Muthukkumarasamy

2019

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…IRs are by their nature usually designed to be OA and interoperable and a primary goal is to be able to link up with other similar archives (Crow, 2002). Several studies (Alipour-Hafezi, Horri, Shiri, & Ghaebi, 2010;Eaton, 2008;Genoni, 2004;Ginsparg, Luce, & Van de Sompel, 1999;Horwood, Sullivan, Fig. 4: Embargo policy.…”

Section: Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Open Access Self Archiving Policies: A Case Study of COAR

Roy

Biswas

Mukhopadhyay

2018

LIBER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines Open Access (OA) self archiving policies of different Open Access Repositories (OARs) affiliated to COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) as partner institutes. The process of scrutiny includes three major activities-selection of databases to consult; comparison and evaluation of Open Access policies of repositories listed in the selected databases and attached to COAR group; and critical examination of available self archiving policies of these OA repositories against a set of selected criteria. The above steps lead to reporting the following results: key findings have been identified and highlighted; common practices have been analyzed in relation to the focus of this paper; and a best practice

show abstract

“…Both implement what AlipourHafezi et al term a federated model in the context of search interoperability, wherein providers agree that their services will conform to certain standard specifications. 17 The costs and adoption risk of this approach are low. Technologies such as OpenSearch occupy an abstraction layer above existing search infrastructure such as Solr.…”

Section: An Open Search Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%