1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(93)90976-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spectrometer for 1 GeV electrons using scintillation detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this exponential decrease an on-line monitor of the luminosity was necessary and a detection of Møller electrons was used to this purpose, as described later on. The scattered electrons were measured at 32 0 , 37.1 0 , 83 0 at different energies from 0.5 to 1.5 GeV with a scintillation detector composed by a front part which allowed mass separation and angular definition and by a rear part consisting of BGO crystals to measure the energy of the scattered electrons and to improve their separation from proton and pion background [12]. Despite the common use of magnetic spectrometers in electron scattering experiments, our calorimeter provided a valid alternative for this apparatus since an energy resolution of few percent was required, still sufficient to separate the broad structures of QE and ∆(1232) peaks.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to this exponential decrease an on-line monitor of the luminosity was necessary and a detection of Møller electrons was used to this purpose, as described later on. The scattered electrons were measured at 32 0 , 37.1 0 , 83 0 at different energies from 0.5 to 1.5 GeV with a scintillation detector composed by a front part which allowed mass separation and angular definition and by a rear part consisting of BGO crystals to measure the energy of the scattered electrons and to improve their separation from proton and pion background [12]. Despite the common use of magnetic spectrometers in electron scattering experiments, our calorimeter provided a valid alternative for this apparatus since an energy resolution of few percent was required, still sufficient to separate the broad structures of QE and ∆(1232) peaks.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suppression factors as deduced from our analysis for 16 O (full squares) and12 C (open circles) as a function of Q 2 at fixed invariant mass W . The result of the analysis[37] at the photon point is also reported (open triangles).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%