2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-017-3083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spectral Approach for Quenched Limit Theorems for Random Expanding Dynamical Systems

Abstract: We prove quenched versions of (i) a large deviations principle (LDP), (ii) a central limit theorem (CLT), and (iii) a local central limit theorem (LCLT) for non-autonomous dynamical systems. A key advance is the extension of the spectral method, commonly used in limit laws for deterministic maps, to the general random setting. We achieve this via multiplicative ergodic theory and the development of a general framework to control the regularity of Lyapunov exponents of twisted transfer operator cocycles with re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
173
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(91 reference statements)
5
173
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous paper [9] we extended the Nagaev-Guivarc'h spectral method to obtain limit theorems, such as the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), the Large Deviation Principle (LDP) and the Local Central Limit Theorem (LCLT), for random dynamical systems governed by a cocycle of maps T (n) ω := T σ n−1 ω • · · · • T σω • T ω , assuming uniform-in-ω eventual expansivity conditions on the maps T ω . The random driving was a general ergodic, invertible transformation σ : Ω on a probability space (Ω, P), and the real observable g was defined on the product space Ω × X → R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous paper [9] we extended the Nagaev-Guivarc'h spectral method to obtain limit theorems, such as the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), the Large Deviation Principle (LDP) and the Local Central Limit Theorem (LCLT), for random dynamical systems governed by a cocycle of maps T (n) ω := T σ n−1 ω • · · · • T σω • T ω , assuming uniform-in-ω eventual expansivity conditions on the maps T ω . The random driving was a general ergodic, invertible transformation σ : Ω on a probability space (Ω, P), and the real observable g was defined on the product space Ω × X → R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…9 Proof. One can follow the proof of Lemma 3.3 (part 2) [9], using the definition of the untwisted transfer operator (7) and Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: Quasi-compactness Of the Twisted Cocycle L θmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• maps T ω , ω ∈ Ω are Anosov diffeomorphisms on a compact Riemannian manifold M that belong to a sufficiently small neighborhood of a fixed Anosov diffeomorphism T on M; • maps T ω , ω ∈ Ω are suitable perturbations of a billiard map associated to the periodic Lorentz gas studied by Demers and Zhang [5]; • (T ω ) ω∈Ω is a family of piecewise expanding maps (either on the unit interval or in higher dimension) satisfying appropriate conditions as in [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%