2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spatially Constrained Multi-Autoencoder approach for multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the spatial distribution features represent the spatial distribution characteristics of various elements, such as the geospatial distribution of sample elements, spatial correlation or spatial heterogeneity. Based on existing research (L. Chen et al., 2019), this study used the three models as follows: AE to extract the combined structural features of multiple elements in the sample, MCAE to extract the spatial distribution features of multiple elements in the sample, and FCAE to extract the combined features of the above two.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the spatial distribution features represent the spatial distribution characteristics of various elements, such as the geospatial distribution of sample elements, spatial correlation or spatial heterogeneity. Based on existing research (L. Chen et al., 2019), this study used the three models as follows: AE to extract the combined structural features of multiple elements in the sample, MCAE to extract the spatial distribution features of multiple elements in the sample, and FCAE to extract the combined features of the above two.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, deep learning algorithms for geochemical anomaly identification have achieved good results in predicting mineral distribution (Chen, Guan, Xiong, et al., 2019; Z. J. Chen et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2021). For example, Y. P. Liu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep learning has been used to help solve geoscience research problems [1][2][3][4][5]. For example, the use of deep learning to solve the problem of mineral prediction will help researchers overcome the difficulty of not fully considering geological variables and evaluating the reliability of the current model in the existing data [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence is an important direction also in geological research and mineral resource exploration (Zhou et al., 2018). Different machine learning algorithms have been applied in metallogenic prediction (Table 1), such as autoencoders (Chen, 2020; Chen et al., 2019; Xiong & Zuo, 2016), recurrent neural networks (Bernardini et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2000; Sehgal et al., 2004), random forest (Carranza & Laborte, 2016; Chen, 2019; Hariharan et al., 2017), support vector machine (SVM) (Chang et al., 2018), semi‐supervised learning neural networks (Gao et al., 2021), and restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) (Chen, 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Hinton, 2010; Wang et al., 2019). In particular, a variety of neural network methods have been applied to metallogenic prediction (Tessema, 2017; Xu, Li, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%