2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00333-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solid-phase competition ELISA for measuring antibody to foot-and-mouth disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
49
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the weakly positive serum be used as the minimum standard for the detection of antibodies in any test applied for herd-based serosurveillance (19). Although the RP ELISA did not score the cutoff positive serum sample as positive, this was consistent with previous results, which indicated that the OIE cutoff serum has been recognized as negative by ELISA methods for FMDV type O and type A (18,19). While the Asia 1 strongly positive serum sample was positive by the RP ELISA, the type O strongly positive serum sample was negative.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…It has been suggested that the weakly positive serum be used as the minimum standard for the detection of antibodies in any test applied for herd-based serosurveillance (19). Although the RP ELISA did not score the cutoff positive serum sample as positive, this was consistent with previous results, which indicated that the OIE cutoff serum has been recognized as negative by ELISA methods for FMDV type O and type A (18,19). While the Asia 1 strongly positive serum sample was positive by the RP ELISA, the type O strongly positive serum sample was negative.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Preliminary specificity trials with German cattle sera (Haas, unpubl. data) appear to confirm the findings of MacKay et al (2001), who reported a high sensitivity and specificity (99.8%) of the SPCE for this species. Thus, either roe deer sera in SPCE was problematic or the hemolysis of roe deer sera had a negative effect on specificity.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although the reported sensitivity of LPBE is approximately 100% and its specificity 95%, these values can vary, and in some cattle populations, especially if under stress, the percentage of animals giving false-positive results can reach 18% (MacKay et al, 2001;Alexandersen et al, 2003). In this study, 5.4% of the sera tested positive by LPBE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these reasons, SPCE has been developed for the detection of antibodies against FMDV. One of the advantages of SPCE is its highly purified and adequately stable 146S preparations of virus used as antigen (Mackay et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%