2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322005000200016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solar collector design procedure for crop drying

Abstract: -A design procedure was proposed for sizing solar-assisted crop-drying systems and assessing the combination of solar collector area and auxiliary energy needs that meets the requirements of the load. Two empirical correlations were compared for use with high thermal inertia solar collectors that are cheap and appropriate for rural areas. A case study as performed in the city of Campinas in southeastern Brazil. Grain drying with partial air heating by solar energy can provide an annual savings of 30% in fuel c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this work, it can be stated that observed loss coefficients and efficiencies, though perhaps useful for comparing alternative designs, are not meaningful for collector design because they depend on the design choices. For example, the range of the overall heat loss coefficient (U L ) at increasing collector length is between 4.3 and 7.7 W m À 2 K À 1 compared with 15 and 24 W m À 2 K À 1 by Koyuncu [13] and 5.5 W m À 2 K À 1 by Santos et al [33] The very different values underline the unsuitability of the heat loss coefficient (U L ) as design parameter.…”
Section: Collector Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…From this work, it can be stated that observed loss coefficients and efficiencies, though perhaps useful for comparing alternative designs, are not meaningful for collector design because they depend on the design choices. For example, the range of the overall heat loss coefficient (U L ) at increasing collector length is between 4.3 and 7.7 W m À 2 K À 1 compared with 15 and 24 W m À 2 K À 1 by Koyuncu [13] and 5.5 W m À 2 K À 1 by Santos et al [33] The very different values underline the unsuitability of the heat loss coefficient (U L ) as design parameter.…”
Section: Collector Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this study, the absorber plate has common standard characteristics to simplify the analysis. These are listed below [1,3,6,7]:…”
Section: Thermal Analysis For Absorber Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [8]) where = mass of water in kilograms (kg), = specific heat of water (J/g ∘ C), Δ = temperature difference (outlet temperature-inlet temperature ∘ C), c = area of collector, = intensity of solar radiation, (W/m 2 ), and = collector efficiency. The equation simply equates the heat acquired by the collector to the heat received by the water.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Collectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [8]). The equation above requires us to know the mass of water to be heated, the specific heat of water ( ) which is a constant (4.18 J/g ∘ C), the outlet and inlet water temperature, the solar insolation of the environment, and the efficiency of the collector.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Collectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation