Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2695664.2695743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A software process line for service-oriented applications

Abstract: The management of processes and systems is a complex and timeconsuming activity for organizations and also an ongoing Information Technology (IT) challenge. Among the different approaches for bringing flexibility to the business processes and systems are Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and Business Process Management (BPM). The SOA approach has become popular providing services and interfaces, enabling integration of heterogeneous and distributed platforms and BPM leverages the cycles of improvements, cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33], a canonical software process family based on the Unified Process (UP) is proposed to support software process tailoring; the UP-process line is constructed based on the CASPER meta-process [10]. In [34], an SPrL is proposed for engineering service-oriented products; an environment is also developed to support the proposed SPrL.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [33], a canonical software process family based on the Unified Process (UP) is proposed to support software process tailoring; the UP-process line is constructed based on the CASPER meta-process [10]. In [34], an SPrL is proposed for engineering service-oriented products; an environment is also developed to support the proposed SPrL.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 shows the results of evaluating our approach and existing model-driven SPrLE approaches based on their support for these four activities. It should be mentioned that tool-focused approaches [27,30,32] and approaches for proposing general SPrLs for specific domains [33,34] have been excluded from this comparison, as they cannot be considered as specialized engineering approaches for constructing bespoke SPrLs. Results of the comparison are explained below:  Construct validity: The first threat to construct validity is misunderstanding the questions in the post-questionnaire; to deal with this, we added explanations to each measure.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%