2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A software architecture for a multi-axis additive manufacturing path-planning tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to mention that few infill strategies have been developed and tested on curved layers [128,132,135,230,231] in order to leverage the extended possibilities provided by RBAM. In particular, basic infill patterns have usually explored, i.e., raster and zig-zag infills, and few physical tests have been performed on functional parts.…”
Section: Contourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to mention that few infill strategies have been developed and tested on curved layers [128,132,135,230,231] in order to leverage the extended possibilities provided by RBAM. In particular, basic infill patterns have usually explored, i.e., raster and zig-zag infills, and few physical tests have been performed on functional parts.…”
Section: Contourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid printing machines allow the manufacture of unique parts, that are more complex than those produced on 3D printers, due to the fact that a hybrid machine has positioning accuracy, a working stroke and rigidity far superior to 3D printers. [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] In order to 3D print on 5-axis hybrid machine tools, in the first phase the 3D model of the part is created and converted into a 3D printed extension program using a post-processor capable of generating codes (NC-code).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While great strides are being made, the relatively poor mechanical strength and weak interlayer adhesion between the successive layers of FFF-printed components can lead to inaccessible damage within the polymer matrix, which can lead to higher material failure rates. Moreover, application of FFF 3D printing is limited by relatively poor surface roughness and accuracy of 3D printed parts. There are numerous factors responsible for the ultimate mechanical properties, and thereby use cases and useful lifetimes, of 3D printed components, including layer thickness, orientation of filaments during 3D printing, air gaps between layers, and process of filament solidification during extrusion for which ongoing research has sought to optimize the mechanical properties of FFF-printed specimens. , For instance, the use of reinforcement fillers such as carbon nanofibers has enhanced the mechanical strength of FFF-printed components, although there are remaining challenges, including fiber orientation in the polymer matrix, fiber–matrix debonding, and void formation. , Another approach to improve the 3D printed component lifetimes and reliability is to use a material system which autonomously heals itself, that is, self-healing. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%