2000
DOI: 10.2307/259272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
151
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
151
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The third research area has been on the relationship between downsizing and corporate performance. While some studies suggest that firms choose to downsize in order to cut costs, and/or to improve financial performance (Espahbodi et al, 2000;Kozlowski et al, 1993;Mone, 1994) -under the assumption that firm's profitability will be increased with fewer employees (Cascio et al, 1997;Mckinley et al, 2000)-another stream of research finds that the effect of personnel reduction on profitability is non-existent or even negative. Therefore, downsizing may be inefficient and companies that downsize may be unable to financially outperform companies that maintain their employees (Mentzer, 1996;Morris et al, 1999;Vanderheiden et al, 1999).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third research area has been on the relationship between downsizing and corporate performance. While some studies suggest that firms choose to downsize in order to cut costs, and/or to improve financial performance (Espahbodi et al, 2000;Kozlowski et al, 1993;Mone, 1994) -under the assumption that firm's profitability will be increased with fewer employees (Cascio et al, 1997;Mckinley et al, 2000)-another stream of research finds that the effect of personnel reduction on profitability is non-existent or even negative. Therefore, downsizing may be inefficient and companies that downsize may be unable to financially outperform companies that maintain their employees (Mentzer, 1996;Morris et al, 1999;Vanderheiden et al, 1999).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the management literature, considerable attention has been devoted to the phenomenon of layoff (see McKinley, Zhao, andRust 2000, andParker andMcKinley 2008, for reviews). One branch of this literature focuses on the effects of layoffs on the individuals who lose their jobs (Leana and Feldman 1992;Leana and Ivancevich 1987;Pugh, Skarlicki, and Passell 2003).…”
Section: Layoff As a Stimulus For Entrepreneurial Intentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a view is consonant with the way that managerialist accounts of downsizing are generally justified in relation to ethics. While examinations of the relations between ethics and downsizing has only recently begun (McKinley et al, 2000;Orlando, 1999), they are largely limited to discussions of employee perceptions of the fairness of decisions made to downsize, and deliberations over the 'most ethical' means through which downsizing can be executed (Lämsä, 1999). When ethics is considered in relation to employees, the focus is on the demands of the process on managers (Lämsä, 1999;Lämsä and Takala, 2000) and how the 'negative effects' can be buttressed, at least to some extent, by 'good' management practice (Palmer et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Refiguration Of V-tech and The Limiting Of Ethical Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%