2011
DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2011.547081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social marketing approach to value creation in a well-women's health service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
101
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent scholarship has started to explore such collaborations as a value creation process and has applied service concepts to interrogate the active role of the 'consumer' in social marketing (Russell-Bennet, Previte and Zainuddin, 2009;Zainuddin, Previte and Russell-Bennett, 2011;Zainuddin, Russell-Bennett 9 and Zainuddin, 2013). Researchers have also applied network and social context theories to conceptualise the processes of multi-actor action, but empirical research, in particular on the socio-cultural dimensions of networks is lacking (Domegan et al, 2013;Luca, Hibbert and McDonald, 2015;Russell-Bennett, Wood and Previte, 2013;Spotswood and Tapp, 2013).…”
Section: Midstream Social Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship has started to explore such collaborations as a value creation process and has applied service concepts to interrogate the active role of the 'consumer' in social marketing (Russell-Bennet, Previte and Zainuddin, 2009;Zainuddin, Previte and Russell-Bennett, 2011;Zainuddin, Russell-Bennett 9 and Zainuddin, 2013). Researchers have also applied network and social context theories to conceptualise the processes of multi-actor action, but empirical research, in particular on the socio-cultural dimensions of networks is lacking (Domegan et al, 2013;Luca, Hibbert and McDonald, 2015;Russell-Bennett, Wood and Previte, 2013;Spotswood and Tapp, 2013).…”
Section: Midstream Social Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors have documented functional value (Chahal & Kumari, 2012), transactional value (Lee & Lin, 2011), social value (Dodds et al, 2014a;Nambisan & Nambisan, 2009;Teke et al, 2012) and emotional value (Sweeney & Soutar, 2001;Zainuddin et al, 2011) One participant had "definitely not" taken images previously yet experienced full empowerment, suggesting disempowered people (in this context empowerment is unsolicited PGHD use) may experience empowerment through engagement and resource creation. This tacitly answers the research questions asked by Leung et al (2012), suggesting that resource generation and engagement can cause empowerment for the disempowered.…”
Section: Gaps In the Literature Research Question Study And Methodolomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, value-in-use concepts suggest experiential values are "interactive relativistic benefits a consumer expects from a particular set of goods and services and a comparison between perceived quality and perceived cost (monetary and non-monetary), and further influences decision-making" (Chahal & Kumari, 2012, p. 723). Zainuddin, Previte, and Russell-Bennett (2011) define value for the patient as an interactive relativistic preference experience and their findings also suggest value constructs overlap with 'control' being both functional and emotional. Hence, in line with these authors and Holbrook (1994), the approach to value in this thesis is meta-normative, concerned not with "making value judgments but rather with analysing the nature of value" (p.5).…”
Section: Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations