2012
DOI: 10.1515/1557-4679.1378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smooth ROC Curve Estimator Based on Log-Concave Density Estimates

Abstract: We introduce a new smooth estimator of the ROC curve based on log-concave density estimates of the constituent distributions. We show that our estimate is asymptotically equivalent to the empirical ROC curve if the underlying densities are in fact log-concave. In addition, we empirically show that our proposed estimator exhibits an efficiency gain for finite sample sizes with respect to the standard empirical estimate in various scenarios and that it is only slightly less efficient, if at all, compared to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the kernel estimation of a density function requires a bandwidth of order N −1/5 , whereas the kernel estimation of the cumulative distribution function should be based on bandwidths of order N −1/3 . In the case of the ordinary ROC curve, smooth estimators have been proposed by Zou et al [21] and Lloyd [22], among others (see Rufibach [23] for a recent review). These estimators basically consist in the combination of kernel estimators of a cumulative distribution function and a quantile function, and require two smoothing parameters, one for each population.…”
Section: Smoothing Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the kernel estimation of a density function requires a bandwidth of order N −1/5 , whereas the kernel estimation of the cumulative distribution function should be based on bandwidths of order N −1/3 . In the case of the ordinary ROC curve, smooth estimators have been proposed by Zou et al [21] and Lloyd [22], among others (see Rufibach [23] for a recent review). These estimators basically consist in the combination of kernel estimators of a cumulative distribution function and a quantile function, and require two smoothing parameters, one for each population.…”
Section: Smoothing Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows results obtained for 100,000 draws from the distributions specified earlier. The histograms of the three variances, shown in Figure 3(a) (note that only the lower 90% of simulated variances is included), show that the bulk of the probability mass ranges now from 0 to 8 5 . The histograms for the correlation coefficients, shown in Figure 3(b), show that for the first two components, the probability mass is equally spread between −1 and 1, in contrast to what can be observed in Figure 2(b).…”
Section: Lower 90% Of Simulated Covariance Component Sigma22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the impact of ignoring the imperfectness of the reference test, the logistic-regression model relating the clinical diagnosis to the three CSF biomarkers was additionally considered [39]. The AUC was computed based on log-condense smoothing of the empirical ROC curve as described by Rufibach [5] and FLAT, the analysis using the flat prior for sensitivity and specificity of the reference test; INF, the analysis using the informative prior for sensitivity and specificity of the reference test ( Figure 1a).…”
Section: Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations