2019
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1574227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smooth Nonparametric, Multivariate, Mixed-Data Location-Scale Test

Abstract: A number of tests have been proposed for assessing the location-scale assumption that is often invoked by practitioners. Existing approaches include Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramérvon-Mises statistics that each involve measures of divergence between unknown joint distribution functions and products of marginal distributions. In practice, the unknown distribution functions embedded in these statistics are approximated using non-smooth empirical distribution functions. We demonstrate how replacing the non-smooth d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimator of the error distribution has been shown to be very useful for testing hypotheses regarding several features of model (1.1), like e.g. testing for the form of the regression function m(·) ), comparing regression curves (Pardo-Fernández et al (2007)), testing independence between ε and X (Einmahl and Van Keilegom (2008) and Racine and Van Keilegom (2017)), testing for symmetry of the error distribution (Koul (2002), Neumeyer and Dette (2007)), among others. The idea in each of these papers is to compare an estimator of the error distribution obtained under the null hypothesis with an estimator that is not based on the null.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimator of the error distribution has been shown to be very useful for testing hypotheses regarding several features of model (1.1), like e.g. testing for the form of the regression function m(·) ), comparing regression curves (Pardo-Fernández et al (2007)), testing independence between ε and X (Einmahl and Van Keilegom (2008) and Racine and Van Keilegom (2017)), testing for symmetry of the error distribution (Koul (2002), Neumeyer and Dette (2007)), among others. The idea in each of these papers is to compare an estimator of the error distribution obtained under the null hypothesis with an estimator that is not based on the null.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%