2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.106895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for validity of the semiparametric heteroskedastic transformation model

Abstract: There exist a number of tests for assessing the nonparametric heteroscedastic location-scale assumption. Here we consider a goodness-of-fit test for the more general hypothesis of the validity of this model under a parametric functional transformation on the response variable. Specifically we consider testing for independence between the regressors and the errors in a model where the transformed response is just a location/scale shift of the error. Our criteria use the familiar factorization property of the jo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exponential θexpðÀθxÞ Exp(θ) A warp-speed bootstrap methodology (Giacomini et al, 2013), which essentially entails using a single bootstrap replication for each Monte Carlo sample generated, is employed in order to calculate empirical powers. This methodology is used in order to reduce the computational cost of the calculation of these powers and has been employed by a number of authors in the literature to compare Monte Carlo performances (see, e.g., Hušková et al, 2020).…”
Section: Alternative Density Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponential θexpðÀθxÞ Exp(θ) A warp-speed bootstrap methodology (Giacomini et al, 2013), which essentially entails using a single bootstrap replication for each Monte Carlo sample generated, is employed in order to calculate empirical powers. This methodology is used in order to reduce the computational cost of the calculation of these powers and has been employed by a number of authors in the literature to compare Monte Carlo performances (see, e.g., Hušková et al, 2020).…”
Section: Alternative Density Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%