2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smart rheologic MSD model pushed/calibrated/evaluated by experimental impulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By taking its time derivative, we haveu Voigt N (t) + u vis N (t) = 0. Substituted this into (15) and considered the second equation of (14) with λ vis 2 µ vis 1 = λ vis 1 µ vis 2 , we have:…”
Section: A Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By taking its time derivative, we haveu Voigt N (t) + u vis N (t) = 0. Substituted this into (15) and considered the second equation of (14) with λ vis 2 µ vis 1 = λ vis 1 µ vis 2 , we have:…”
Section: A Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them employed MSD model to simulate and analyze the deformation of objects [12], [13], [14], [15]. But none of them took inner deformation into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors explored the lattice [Noborio et al (2003), Nogami et al (2004a)], the truss [Nogami et al (2004b)], and the hierarchical [Ikawa & Noborio (2007)] structures, with decreased MSD elements connected between nodes to reduce the computation cost. Two optimization methods, modified randomized algorithm [Noborio et al (2003)] and genetic algorithm [Yoshida et al (2005)], were used to estimate the physical parameters. The authors successfully captured the deformation behaviors, but failed to reproduce the force responses at the same time [Yoshida et al (2005)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two optimization methods, modified randomized algorithm [Noborio et al (2003)] and genetic algorithm [Yoshida et al (2005)], were used to estimate the physical parameters. The authors successfully captured the deformation behaviors, but failed to reproduce the force responses at the same time [Yoshida et al (2005)]. The MSD modeling method has advantages of simple formulation and relatively low computation cost, but the formulation is not based on continuum mechanics and the geometrical topology significantly affects the simulation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this model is still a 1D case. Mass-springdamper (MSD) model was employed to model a food dough and different topological structures were investigated in [5], [6]. The MSD model has an advantage of low computational cost [7], but the formulation is not based on continuum mechanics and the simulation accuracy is quite limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%