1985
DOI: 10.1515/znc-1985-5-614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Study on Pre-Irradiated Malate Synthase. The Influence of Formate, Superoxide Dismutase, and Catalase on the X-Ray Induced Aggregation of the Enzyme

Abstract: The sulfhydryl enzyme malate synthase from baker’s yeast was X-irradiated with 6 kGy in air-saturated aqueous solution (enzyme concentration: ≃ 10 mg/ml; volume: 120 μl), in the absence or presence of the specific scavengers formate, superoxide dismutase, and catalase. After X-irradiation, a small aliquot of the irradiated solutions was tested for enzymic activity while the main portion was investigated by means of small-angle X-ray scattering. Additionally, an unir­radiated sample without additives was invest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cryocooling samples to 100 K has been shown to reduce radiation damage rates in SAXS (Meisburger et al, 2013;Hopkins et al, 2015), but substantial methodological development is required before cryocooling can be accepted for routine use. Despite the importance of radiation damage as a limiting factor in SAXS, early efforts using laboratory X-ray sources (Zipper & Durchschlag, 1980a,b,c, 1981Zipper et al, 1980Zipper et al, , 1985Zipper & Kriechbaum, 1986) have been followed by only two systematic, quantitative studies at synchrotron sources (Kuwamoto et al, 2004;Jeffries et al, 2015). With recent and planned upgrades to already bright third-generation sources and construction of high-brightness fourth-generation sources, understanding, quantifying and ultimately minimizing radiation damage in biological SAXS will be essential to efficient use and full exploitation of these sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryocooling samples to 100 K has been shown to reduce radiation damage rates in SAXS (Meisburger et al, 2013;Hopkins et al, 2015), but substantial methodological development is required before cryocooling can be accepted for routine use. Despite the importance of radiation damage as a limiting factor in SAXS, early efforts using laboratory X-ray sources (Zipper & Durchschlag, 1980a,b,c, 1981Zipper et al, 1980Zipper et al, , 1985Zipper & Kriechbaum, 1986) have been followed by only two systematic, quantitative studies at synchrotron sources (Kuwamoto et al, 2004;Jeffries et al, 2015). With recent and planned upgrades to already bright third-generation sources and construction of high-brightness fourth-generation sources, understanding, quantifying and ultimately minimizing radiation damage in biological SAXS will be essential to efficient use and full exploitation of these sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%