2013
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2013.072313.121040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single-User Noncoherent Combining Scheme Achieving Multiuser Interference Mitigation for FFH/MFSK Systems

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel low-complexity single-user noncoherent combining scheme, named as the erasure-supported equal-gain combining assisted detector (ES-EGCD), for signal detection in fast frequency-hopping M -ary frequency-shift keying (FFH/MFSK) systems. In the proposed ES-EGCD, the decision variables are formed based on the principles of equal-gain combining (EGC), after erasing a number of entries having the largest values from each of the rows of a so-called detection matrix formed during dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because that, non‐coherent receivers are easy to implement, and especially that, they can avoid the channel estimation, which was once deemed impractical in FFH systems. The bit error ratio (BER) of the non‐coherent FFH/MFSK has been extensively studied with various diversity combining schemes, including linear combining [2, 3], product combining [4–7], clipped combining [8, 9], maximum‐likelihood (ML) combining [10–15], self‐normalisation combining [16–19], and noise‐normalisation combining [20, 21], among which the ML receiver gives the optimum BER performance. For the non‐coherent FFH/MFSK, however, one of the major shortcomings is the low spectral efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because that, non‐coherent receivers are easy to implement, and especially that, they can avoid the channel estimation, which was once deemed impractical in FFH systems. The bit error ratio (BER) of the non‐coherent FFH/MFSK has been extensively studied with various diversity combining schemes, including linear combining [2, 3], product combining [4–7], clipped combining [8, 9], maximum‐likelihood (ML) combining [10–15], self‐normalisation combining [16–19], and noise‐normalisation combining [20, 21], among which the ML receiver gives the optimum BER performance. For the non‐coherent FFH/MFSK, however, one of the major shortcomings is the low spectral efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFH employs a number of advantages including capability of antijamming, robustness against multipath fading, and low probability of interception [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of jamming, various diversity combining schemes have been proposed for noncoherent frequency shift keying (FSK) based FFH, including maximum likelihood (ML) combining [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], FFT based combining schemes [8], linear combining (LC) [9], self-normalization combining [10], noise-normalization combining [11], product combining [12][13][14][15][16][17], and clipped combining [18,19]. Among the noncoherent FFH/FSK combining schemes, ML combining yields the best BER performance in the presence of jamming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFSK technology combined with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing thinking, its spectral efficiency, communication rate and anti-interference capabilities are greatly enhanced. Frequency hopping is an important way of spread spectrum communication [10], which has many merits, such as anti-narrowband interference, anti-noise, easy to networking, as well as good confidentiality, makes it attracte great attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%