1988
DOI: 10.1080/00207148808409331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single-Session Group Self-Hypnosis Smoking Cessation Treatment: A Brief Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abstinence rates resulting from our trial are comparable, despite figuring at the lower end, to other studies of a single session of group hypnosis (18.5-25% abstinence) [15,18,25]. Two studies reported higher abstinence rates of 45–50% [26,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The abstinence rates resulting from our trial are comparable, despite figuring at the lower end, to other studies of a single session of group hypnosis (18.5-25% abstinence) [15,18,25]. Two studies reported higher abstinence rates of 45–50% [26,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The date of program attendance, provided by ALA of Ohio branch offices, was confirmed with each participant. Smolung cessation for purposes of this study was defined as not having smoked cigarettes for the past 30 days (Neufeld & Lynn, 1988). The average time for completion of the interview was 9.4 minutes with completion time ranging from 4 to 27 minutes.…”
Section: Dafa Collection Lntemiewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 3-month follow-up, predictors of cessation were number of cigarettes smoked prior to the intervention (Lambe, Osier, & Franks, 1986;Neufeld & Lynn, 1988) and social support (Neufeld & LYM, 1988). At 6-month follow-up, smoking cessation correlated with the number of previous quit attempts (Lambe et al, 1986;D.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-controlled experimental research comparing the relative effectiveness of divergent treatment strategies is sorely lacking. In the absence of evidence of superiority of one treatment approach over another, smokers may rely on personal preference and their subjective expectation of success when choosing a particular approach (Neufeld & Lynn, 1988). Hypnosis-based treatments may be an excellent entry-level choice, however, because they tend to be relatively inexpensive and do not necessarily require extended interactions between client and therapist (Lynn et al, 1994).…”
Section: Using Hypnosis In the Treatment Of Smoking And Weight Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%