2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00859-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Enlarged Pancreas on Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter certainly represents a group of cases in whom a negative FNA should be doubted and put into perspective with clinical likelihood. This study confirmed previous experience from other centers, partially also focusing on indeterminate CT findings in which the rate of missed cancers by EUS was excessively low [49][50][51] ; they nevertheless exist [3] . It can, however, be concluded that -with indeterminate CT or transabdominal ultrasound findings -an EUS examination negative for a tumor mass appears to be quite reliable.…”
Section: Pancreatic Cancer: 'Diagnosis' and Differential Diagnosissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The latter certainly represents a group of cases in whom a negative FNA should be doubted and put into perspective with clinical likelihood. This study confirmed previous experience from other centers, partially also focusing on indeterminate CT findings in which the rate of missed cancers by EUS was excessively low [49][50][51] ; they nevertheless exist [3] . It can, however, be concluded that -with indeterminate CT or transabdominal ultrasound findings -an EUS examination negative for a tumor mass appears to be quite reliable.…”
Section: Pancreatic Cancer: 'Diagnosis' and Differential Diagnosissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Pancreatic cancer was found in 21% of the patients in our study compared with 8% reported by Ho et al [11]. Our results further demonstrate the superiority of EUS over CT for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although EUS has the highest detection rate for a pancreatic mass compared with other modalities, such as ultrasound, CT, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [9], and is being increasingly used in the evaluation of patients with inconclusive CT findings [10]; however, the clinical significance of such indeterminate CT findings has not been extensively reported [11]. Such patients in the appropriate clinical context are certainly at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Catanzaro et al [26], 80 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer on the basis of CT or clinical/laboratory findings underwent a negative EUS, and none were found to ultimately develop pancreatic cancer. Similarly, in a group of patients with ambiguous pancreatic head enlargement on CT reported by Ho et al [27], none of the patients with a negative EUS result had their diagnosis change with follow-up.…”
Section: Pancreatic Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 74%