2009
DOI: 10.1159/000178875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Disease — Its Influence on Surgical Decision-Making An Update 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalano et al studied 37 patients with EUS evidence of chronic pancreatitis on EUS, but with normal CT studies and secretin function tests. 2/3 of these patients ultimately developed evidence of chronic pancreatitis on either a follow-up CT or secretin function test [7,12].…”
Section: Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Catalano et al studied 37 patients with EUS evidence of chronic pancreatitis on EUS, but with normal CT studies and secretin function tests. 2/3 of these patients ultimately developed evidence of chronic pancreatitis on either a follow-up CT or secretin function test [7,12].…”
Section: Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, EUS has been shown to be clearly superior to CT in its ability to detect pancreatic cancer, with sensitivities ranging from 96% to 98% [2,12,21,22]. However, given the ability of CT to detect the vast majority of pancreatic cancers in a far less invasive fashion, the primary diagnostic utility of EUS is based upon: (1) the use of EUS in ambiguous cases where a mass is suspected, but cannot be absolutely confirmed on CT, and (2) the ability to perform EUSguided FNA.…”
Section: Pancreatic Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When EUS is compared to other imaging modalities, although it is not a 100% foolproof method [39][40][41] , it still remains one of the best choices to detect a pancreatic neoplasm [30,35,42] . However, it should be emphasized that many of the studies comparing EUS and other crosssectional imaging techniques are characterized by the absence of blinding amongst examiners, and therefore an objective assessment of the superiority of one test over another is hard [43,44] . In everyday clinical practice, the role of CT, EUS and of other available imaging tests concerning the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer is, in fact, complementary.…”
Section: Eus Vs Other Imaging Techniques In the Diagnosis Of Pancreatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS-FNA in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer EUS-FNA has offered new potential to EUS, as it allows for transmural tissue diagnosis with minimum invasion. EUS-FNA can therefore be extremely useful for various indications, such as suspected pancreatic cancer, diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, or differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass or smaller lesions [30,36,43,[53][54][55][56][57] . The indications of EUS-FNA are quite controversial, except for cases where chemotherapy or radiotherapy is needed.…”
Section: Eus or Pet In The Diagnosis Of Pancreatic Cancer?mentioning
confidence: 99%