2017
DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simulation for Managing Complexity in Sales and Operations Planning Decisions

Abstract: Within the classroom it is often difficult to convey the complexities and intricacies that go into making sales and operations planning decisions. This article describes an in‐class simulation that allows students to gain hands‐on experience with the complexities in making forecasting, inventory, and supplier selection decisions as part of the sales and operations planning process. The activity may be run during one class period and is flexible enough to accommodate almost any class size. During the simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They tend to generate more interest and participation among students than traditional approaches and teach skills such as critical thinking and teamwork (Lovelace et al., 2016; Ranchhod, Gurău, Loukis, & Trivedi, 2014). Postsimulation discussions help students connect their experience with their performance (DuHadway & Dreyfus, 2017). Longer simulations are more likely to help students through the learning process and to foster deep thinking and integration of knowledge (Cavanaugh, Giapponi, & Golden, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tend to generate more interest and participation among students than traditional approaches and teach skills such as critical thinking and teamwork (Lovelace et al., 2016; Ranchhod, Gurău, Loukis, & Trivedi, 2014). Postsimulation discussions help students connect their experience with their performance (DuHadway & Dreyfus, 2017). Longer simulations are more likely to help students through the learning process and to foster deep thinking and integration of knowledge (Cavanaugh, Giapponi, & Golden, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After solving the model to determine the optimal network structure and conducting a sensitivity analysis on that network by changing various model parameters, students then modify the model to consider the scenario where one of the facilities in the network is disrupted by going offline for a period of time. DuHadway and Dreyfus (2017) detailed a Sales and Operations Planning simulation that includes the random occurrence of significant positive or negative events in each period whose probability of occurrence is based on the students’ decisions within the simulation with respect to supplier and equipment selection. These activities and approaches do cover the issue of supply chain risk management, but that coverage is from a relatively narrow context or perspective such as within a very specific decision environment.…”
Section: Literature Review On Teaching Supply Chain Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey was completed only in the final two sections, and all 23 students who participated in the exercise completed the survey. The survey questions were based on previous surveys of teaching innovations (DuHadway & Dreyfus, 2017; Hartman et al., 2013), and they were measured on a seven‐point Likert scale that ranged from “ Strongly Disagree ” (1) to “ Strongly Agree ” (7). The survey was given at the end of the case discussion and again at the end of the simulation, with the wording altered to reference either the case or the simulation.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%