1999
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1999.638_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Practical Method for Evaluating Liquefaction-Induced Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We tried to simulate small discretization size in 8 times' wider boundary but failed due to the limitation of computer. However, it could be inferred that as the boundary size increases and particle size decreases, drag force should be consistent to the theoretical results computed by equation (3) to (5).…”
Section: (2) Verification Of Sph Simulationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tried to simulate small discretization size in 8 times' wider boundary but failed due to the limitation of computer. However, it could be inferred that as the boundary size increases and particle size decreases, drag force should be consistent to the theoretical results computed by equation (3) to (5).…”
Section: (2) Verification Of Sph Simulationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Hamada and Wakamatsu 4) conducted researches on lateral displacement of inclined liquefied ground model, and use pseudo-plastic flow to describe its property: the viscosity decrease as the shear strain rate increase. They also found that liquefied sand will return to solid again while a certain shear strain is reached, which is confirmed by Yasuda et al 5) as the recovery of rigidity. Shimizu 6) conducted a series of shaking table model experiments to visualize the dynamic behavior of liquefied sand around a rigid pile model, and validated that equivalent viscosity of liquefied sand is about 1000 to 10000 times of water.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Yasuda et al (1999) performed monotonic loading after cyclic loading to evaluate the shear behaviors that occur during the post-liquefaction phase and confirmed the recovery of effective stress. Other studies found that the residual shear strain is composed of a shear strain component depending on change in effective stress, and a shear strain component independent of effective stress (Shamoto et al, 1997;Wang and Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, they confirmed through centrifuge model experiments that surface ground improvement is an effective countermeasure against liquefaction. Furthermore, they utilized GEOASIA, ALID 27) , etc., for numerical analysis in order to investigate the thickness of the solidified surface ground layer that would satisfy the performance requirement criteria for houses to counter liquefaction damage.…”
Section: Ground Improvement Ground Reinforcement Methodolo-gies Andmentioning
confidence: 99%