2017
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1309601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Model to Evaluate the Dynamic Rocking Behavior of Irregular Free-Standing Rigid Bodies Calibrated with Experimental Shaking-Table Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a very early study in this area, Housner [12] proposed a seminal framework to evaluate the seismic response of a solitary rigid block placed on a rigid base. Following this pioneering work, investigators over the world have endeavored to evaluate the rocking response of freestanding blocks, including experimental [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and numerical approaches [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Early researchers have observed that a rocking motion has extremely complex dynamic characteristics and is barely "nonrepeatable" [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a very early study in this area, Housner [12] proposed a seminal framework to evaluate the seismic response of a solitary rigid block placed on a rigid base. Following this pioneering work, investigators over the world have endeavored to evaluate the rocking response of freestanding blocks, including experimental [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and numerical approaches [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Early researchers have observed that a rocking motion has extremely complex dynamic characteristics and is barely "nonrepeatable" [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain geometric and interface combinations yield a more stable top block (also named "tower") in a dual-body configuration compared to a single-body configuration, because of the dependence of the pedestal response on the geometry of the tower. Irregular free-standing dual-blocks subjected to earthquake motions were also studied experimentally and numerically by Arredondo et al, 40 Al Abadi et al, 41 Khalid Saifullah et al, 42 and Anagnostopoulos et al 43 Experimental shaking-table tests were carried out on modular prototypes, which allow the replication of representative mass distributions, sizes, and/or slenderness ratios for typical objects. The tests were used to calibrate the numerical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have made an initial step toward irregular geometries by studying block geometries and including parameters to account for eccentricity in the center of mass compared with the geometric center of the block (Plaut et al 1996;Zulli et al 2012;Boroschek and Romo 2004;Arredondo et al 2017;Abadi et al 2017). However, these models have omitted sliding and 3 Burton, June 19, 2023 free flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%