2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1792272
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Model for Determining Interfacial Position in Convergent Microchannel Flows

Abstract: Previous experimental and computational studies have indicated that interfaces formed in steady, converging microchannel flows with similar liquids tend to be planar in nature under a variety of conditions relevant to micro-scale flows, including MEMS/microfluidic devices and even microcirculatory blood flows. Assuming a planar interface, we have developed an analytical framework to predict the fully developed interfacial location downstream of a convergence of identical microchannels. Results have been obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3d). The relation between Q* and β observed in the experiments is approximately described by the analytical equation derived by Hitt and Macken 68 for describing the planar surface position formed between converging flows of two substreams of one identical liquid in a Fig. 7 The measured total frictional pressure drop (ΔP tot,exp ) under the three-phase slug flow in the chip versus the model predictions (ΔP tot,model ) given by eqn ( 6) and (7).…”
Section: Interfacial Position and Pressure Drop In A Liquid-liquid Pa...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…3d). The relation between Q* and β observed in the experiments is approximately described by the analytical equation derived by Hitt and Macken 68 for describing the planar surface position formed between converging flows of two substreams of one identical liquid in a Fig. 7 The measured total frictional pressure drop (ΔP tot,exp ) under the three-phase slug flow in the chip versus the model predictions (ΔP tot,model ) given by eqn ( 6) and (7).…”
Section: Interfacial Position and Pressure Drop In A Liquid-liquid Pa...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For very large values of R 1 and R 2 , where the interfacial surface is almost flat (as is the case with parallel flow), Dp is approximately 0. The assumption of a planar fluid interface formed in steady, converging microchannel flows has already been made by Galambos and Forster (1998) and Hitt and Macken (2004). In this work, the assumption was also made through experimental observation and contact angle measurement.…”
Section: Methods Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They also numerically calculated the steady-state developed velocity profiles for two-phase parallel flow and Galambos and Forster (1998) used an analytical solution of simplified Navier-Stokes equations to obtain the velocity profile at steady-state and to predict the position of the interface of developed flow. Similarly, Hitt and Macken (2004) predicted the fully developed interfacial location downstream of a convergence of identical microchannels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from the microfluidics literature that the spreading of parallel streams is related to the viscosity ratio between the streams. 26,27 In expansion flow, the recirculation length and width are set by the degree of spreading of the concentrated core region downstream of the expansion. The overlap of the three curves in Fig.…”
Section: ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%